--> I'm Lucky 최근글 <--

'임금'에 해당되는 글 12건




  1. 2012.11.05 미국 연봉 순위 : 미국 회사 연봉 순위, 최고 평균 연봉
  2. 2010.05.31 김문수, STX조선해양 사례, 벤치마킹 언급 부적절 4
  3. 2010.04.15 베이지북 Beige Book 2010년 4월호 _FRB, 미국 경제상황 보고 _10.04.14
  4. 2010.04.09 국가통계포털, 통계청, KOSIS.kr 통계지표 활용하기
  5. 2009.09.10 베이지북 Beige Book 9월호 _FRB 미국 경제상황 보고 _09.09.09
  6. 2009.08.25 금호타이어 파업, 설득력 없다 23
  7. 2009.07.16 미국 산업생산, Industrial Production 7월 -0.4% _09.07.16
  8. 2009.07.02 비정규직의 기원을 아십니까? 18

 

미국 연봉 순위를 살펴볼까요~ (U.S. Job Salary)

 

미국에서 최고 연봉을 제공하는 회사는 바로! 다음과 같이 나타났습니다.

 

최근 공개 데이터에 따르면, "평균연봉"이 제일 높은 회사는 '법률자문회사'네요!  평균연봉이므로 개별적인 연봉 범위는 훨씬 넓습니다.

 

법률회사들에 이어서, 금융 서비스/금융기관, 최선도 IT회사들이 뒤를 잇고 있으며, 일부 병원도 높은 연봉을 제공하고 있네요. 

'검색엔진'으로 개별 회사들에 대해서 자세히 검색해 볼 수 있습니다.  list_name.xlsx

 

Employer (고용회사/기관)

Average (평균연봉)

Skadden Arps Slate Meagher Flom

$189k

Weil Gotshal Manges

$184k

Shearman Sterling

$176k

White Case

$164k

Marshfield Clinic

$145k

University Of Pittsburgh Physicians

$137k

D E Shaw

$117k

Citadel Investment Group

$115k

Baha Industries

$113k

Barclays Bank Plc

$111k

Mckinsey Company Inc United States

$110k

Barclays Global Investors

$109k

Hsbc Securities Usa

$109k

Apple

$108k

Juniper Networks

$108k

Barclays Capital

$108k

The Boston Consulting Group

$108k

Facebook

$108k

Palm

$107k

Booz Allen Hamilton

$106k

A T Kearney

$106k

Atheros Communications

$106k

Brocade Communications Systems

$105k

Credit Suisse Securities

$104k

Apple Computer

$104k

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

$104k

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

$104k

Nomura Securities International

$104k

Moody S Investors Service

$103k

Shell International Exploration And Production

$103k

Dreamworks Animation

$103k

Hitachi Global Storage Technologies

$103k

Lehman Brothers

$102k

Barclays Services

$102k

Adobe Systems

$102k

Infosys Consulting

$102k

Goldman Sachs

$101k

Morgan Stanley

$101k

Ebay

$101k

Paypal

$101k

Nvidia

$101k

Intuit

$101k

Axon Solutions

$101k

Deutsche Bank Securities

$101k

Sony Pictures Imageworks

$101k

Myspace

$101k

Google

$100k

Chevron

$100k

Vmware

$100k

Tibco Software

$100k

Walgreen

$100k

Salesforce

$100k

Amazon Corporate

$100k

Sg Americas Securities

$100k

Exxon Mobil

$100k

Hitachi Consulting

$100k

Alliancebernstein

$100k

Biogen Idec

$100k

Extreme Networks

$100k

Deutsche Bank

$99k

Bear Stearns

$99k

General Electric Co Global Research Center

$99k

Alcatel Lucent Usa

$99k

Bain

$99k

Iac Search Media

$99k

Ge Capital

$99k

Tellabs San Jose

$99k

Broadcom

$98k

Sap Labs

$98k

Credit Suisse Securities Usa

$98k

Citigroup Global Markets

$97k

Citibank

$97k

Ubs Securities

$97k

Bnp Paribas

$97k

Redback Networks

$97k

Capgemini America

$97k

Ubs

$96k

Alcatel Usa

$96k

Bp America

$96k

Sita

$96k

Safeway

$96k

Societe Generale

$96k

Occidental Oil And Gas

$95k

American International Group

$95k

Varian Medical Systems

$95k

Genentech

$94k

Kla Tencor

$94k

Vmware An Emc

$94k

Sandisk

$94k

Netapp

$94k

Glotel

$94k

Ciena

$94k

Patel Consultants

$94k

Kbr

$94k

Magma Design Automation

$94k

Citigroup Technology

$94k

Directv

$94k

Sanofi Aventis Us

$94k

Starwood Hotels Resorts Worldwide

$94k

Sony Computer Entertainment America

$94k

Jds Uniphase

$94k

Lsi

$94k

Wal Mart Associates

$93k

Banc Of America Securities

$93k

Verisign

$93k

Ca

$93k

Henry Ford Health System

$93k

Pepsico

$93k

Worleyparsons Group

$93k

Hyperion Solutions

$93k

Jpmorgan Chase

$92k

Bloomberg

$92k

Amazon Global Resources

$92k

American Express Travel Related Services

$92k

Credit Suisse First Boston

$92k

Headstrong Services

$92k

Conocophillips

$92k

Bea Systems

$92k

Agere Systems

$92k

Comcast Cable Communications

$92k

Inovant

$92k

Spansion

$92k

Princeton Information

$92k

Charles Schwab

$92k

Barclays Capital Services

$92k

Sonicwall

$92k

Pegasystems

$92k

Microsoft

$91k

Amgen

$91k

Schering Plough

$91k

Xilinx

$91k

Ubs Ag Stamford Branch

$91k

Applera

$91k

Wyeth

$91k

Network Appliance

$91k

Seal Consulting

$91k

Lsi Logic

$91k

Flextronics International Usa

$91k

Becton Dickinson

$91k

Virtusa

$91k

Lam Research

$91k

Openwave Systems

$91k

Veritas Software

$91k

Teradata Operations

$91k

American Express Trs

$91k

Capgemini Us

$90k

Symantec

$90k

Bristol Myers Squibb

$90k

Lucent Technologies

$90k

Sap America

$90k

Avaya

$90k

Sas Institute

$90k

Skyworks Solutions

$90k

Mcafee

$90k

Akamai Technologies

$90k

Wells Fargo Bank

$90k

Winn Dixie Stores

$90k

Activision Publishing

$90k

Citrix Online

$90k

St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Mgmt Div

$90k

Cisco Systems

$89k

Merrill Lynch

$89k

Automatic Data Processing

$89k

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

$89k

Applied Materials

$89k

Washington Mutual Bank

$89k

Citicorp North America

$89k

Citicorp Credit Services

$89k

Wachovia Bank

$89k

Broadridge Financial Solutions

$89k

Forest Laboratories

$89k

Vitech Systems Group

$89k

Deloitte Services

$89k

Bmc Software

$89k

Alcatel Usa Resources

$89k

Logitech

$89k

Marvell Semiconductor

$88k

Stmicroelectronics

$88k

Altera

$88k

The Boeing

$88k

Vertex Pharmaceuticals

$88k

National Economic Research Associates

$88k

Yahoo

$87k

Nokia

$87k

Countrywide Home Loans

$87k

Sapient

$87k

General Motors

$87k

Cadence Design Systems

$87k

National Semiconductor

$87k

Agilent Technologies

$87k

E Trade Financial

$87k

Albertson S

$87k

Fluor Enterprises

$87k

Telcordia Technologies

$87k

International Rectifier

$87k

Ibm

$86k

Qualcomm

$86k

Sun Microsystems

$86k

Bank Of America

$86k

Abbott Laboratories

$86k

Sapphire Technologies

$86k

Synopsys

$86k

Informatica

$86k

The Gap

$86k

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

$86k

Research In Motion

$86k

Sony Electronics

$86k

Paragon Computer Professionals

$86k

Rf Micro Devices

$86k

Foster Wheeler Usa

$86k

Hewlett Packard

$85k

Verizon Data Services

$85k

Hsbc Bank Usa

$85k

Eli Lilly

$85k

Philips Electronics North America

$85k

Oracle America

$85k

Blackrock Financial Management

$85k

Conexant Systems

$85k

Business Objects Americas

$85k

Samsung Telecommunications America

$85k

Mercury Interactive

$85k

Ariba

$85k

Aol

$85k

Omnivision Technologies

$85k

Deloitte Consulting

$84k

Bearingpoint

$84k

International Business Machines

$84k

Advanced Micro Devices

$84k

Seagate Us

$84k

Siebel Systems

$84k

Mentor Graphics

$84k

Wachovia

$84k

Comverse

$84k

Etouch Systems

$84k

Citigroup

$84k

Airvana

$84k

Medimmune

$84k

Electronics For Imaging

$84k

Intel

$83k

Texas Instruments

$83k

Emc

$83k

Honeywell International

$83k

Client Network Services

$83k

Autodesk

$83k

University Of Miami Miller School Of Medicine

$83k

Verizon Business Network Services

$83k

Technip Usa

$83k

Zs Associates

$83k

Western Digital Technologies

$83k

Cap Gemini Ernst Young Us

$83k

E I Dupont De Nemours

$83k

Opnet Technologies

$83k

Fannie Mae

$83k

Bayer Healthcare

$83k

Eastman Kodak

$83k

Pfizer

$82k

The Mathworks

$82k

Amdocs

$82k

Ajilon

$82k

Capgemini Financial Services Usa

$82k

The Dow Chemical

$82k

Reuters America

$82k

At T

$82k

Baxter Healthcare

$82k

Ims Health

$82k

Invensys Systems

$82k

Merkle

$82k

Nortel Networks

$81k

University Of Arkansas For Medical Sciences

$81k

At T Services

$81k

Siemens Medical Solutions Usa

$81k

New York University

$81k

Expedia

$81k

Unisys

$81k

Maxim Integrated Products

$81k

Jacobs Engineering Group

$81k

Peoplesoft

$81k

Nexius

$81k

Spirent Communications

$81k

Novellus Systems

$81k

Fmr

$81k

Baker Hughes

$81k

Electronic Data Systems Eds

$81k

Marsh Usa

$81k

Chevrontexaco

$81k

Tyco Electronics

$81k

Aspen Technology

$81k

Weatherford International

$81k

Bristlecone

$81k

Dell Usa

$80k

Fujitsu America

$80k

Sogeti Usa

$80k

Electronic Data Systems

$80k

Cgi Technologies And Solutions

$80k

Verizon Services

$80k

Perficient

$80k

Discover Financial Services

$80k

Sabre

$80k

Saama Technologies

$80k

Affiliated Computer Services

$80k

Susquehanna International Group

$80k

Polo Ralph Lauren

$80k

Quintiles

$80k

Wachovia Securities

$80k

Sanmina Sci

$80k

Fti

$80k

Micron Technology

$79k

Dell Products

$79k

Halliburton Energy Services

$79k

Nokia Siemens Networks Us

$79k

Whirlpool

$79k

Electronic Arts

$79k

Praxair

$79k

Thomson Financial

$79k

Apollo Group

$79k

Aetna Life Insurance

$79k

Daimlerchrysler

$79k

Xerox

$79k

Equant

$79k

Thomson

$79k

Millennium Pharmaceuticals

$79k

Infor Global Solutions

$79k

Ncr

$79k

Kellogg Brown Root

$79k

Farmers Group

$79k

Capital One Auto Finance

$79k

Oracle Usa

$78k

Accenture

$78k

Federal Home Loan Mortgage

$78k

Medtronic

$78k

State Street Bank And Trust

$78k

Metlife Group

$78k

Teradyne

$78k

Robert Bosch

$78k

Marriott International

$78k

Novartis Institutes For Biomedical Research

$78k

Staples

$78k

Cargill

$78k

Consultants Exchange Usa

$78k

Rei Systems

$78k

Level 3 Communications

$78k

Siemens Energy

$78k

Smithkline Beecham

$78k

Ugs

$78k

It Convergence

$78k

Knightsbridge Solutions

$78k

Merck

$77k

Microstrategy Services

$77k

Smithklinebeecham Corporation D B Aglaxosmithkline

$77k

Mckesson

$77k

Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center

$77k

Los Alamos National Laboratory

$77k

Cgi Ams

$77k

Ads Alliance Data Systems

$77k

Science Applications International

$77k

Deloitte Financial Advisory Services

$77k

Dendrite International

$77k

Harris

$77k

Boston College

$77k

Amdocs Champaign

$77k

Fujitsu Consulting

$76k

General Electric

$76k

Mayo Clinic Rochester

$76k

Medical College Of Wisconsin

$76k

Computer Sciences

$76k

Cardinal Health

$76k

Iconsoft

$76k

Rockwell Automation

$76k

Eaton

$76k

I2 Technologies Us

$76k

Fmc Technologies

$76k

Ists Worldwide

$76k

United Airlines

$76k

Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies

$76k

Perot Systems

$76k

Beckman Coulter

$76k

Smith International

$76k

Pricewaterhousecoopers

$75k

T Mobile Usa

$75k

Accenture Technology Solutions

$75k

Bdo Seidman

$75k

Ptc

$75k

Corning

$75k

Analog Devices

$75k

Liberty Mutual Insurance

$75k

Celcite Management Solutions

$75k

Genzyme

$75k

Ford Motor

$75k

Siemens Energy Automation

$75k

Deere

$75k

Manugistics

$75k

Centers For Disease Control And Prevention

$75k

The Goodyear Tire Rubber

$75k

Gulfstream Aerospace

$75k

Siemens Vdo Automotive

$75k

Quest Diagnostics

$75k

Medical Management International

$75k

Caterpillar

$74k

Capital One Services

$74k

Sprint Nextel

$74k

Ericsson

$74k

Cingular Wireless

$74k

Ge Medical Systems

$74k

Hughes Network Systems

$74k

American Airlines

$74k

University Of Miami

$74k

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals

$74k

Mercer Human Resource Consulting

$74k

Los Alamos National Security

$74k

Realnetworks

$74k

Fair Isaac

$74k

Covance

$74k

Techaspect Solutions

$74k

The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr

$74k

Fis Management Services

$74k

University Of Miami School Of Medicine

$74k

Goodrich

$74k

Lancesoft

$73k

Freescale Semiconductor

$73k

Cypress Semiconductor

$73k

Towers Perrin

$73k

Montefiore Medical Center

$73k

National Institutes Of Health Hhs

$73k

The Curators Of The University Of Missouri

$73k

Microstrategy

$73k

Optimos

$73k

Mastech Inc A Mastech Holdings

$73k

Rockwell Collins

$73k

Tavant Technologies

$73k

Bechtel Power

$73k

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

$73k

Computer Task Group

$73k

Delphi

$73k

Im Flash Technologies

$73k

Cameron International

$73k

Computer Horizons

$73k

United Healthcare Services

$73k

Motorola

$72k

Ciber

$72k

Eckerd

$72k

Intelligroup

$72k

Boston Scientific

$72k

Adea Solutions

$72k

Ibm India Pvt

$72k

Infinite Computer Solutions

$72k

Pitney Bowes

$72k

Computer Associates International

$72k

Schlumberger Technology

$71k

Fidelity Investments

$71k

Kanbay

$71k

Aditi Technologies Pvt

$71k

Hewlett Packard Globalsoft

$71k

Comsys Services

$71k

Synechron

$71k

Cincinnati Children S Hospital Medical Center

$71k

Trinus

$71k

Electric Reliability Council Of Texas

$71k

Bechtel Oil Gas And Chemicals

$71k

Washington Group International

$71k

Ncs Pearson

$71k

Lionbridge Technologies

$71k

Keane

$70k

National Institutes Of Health

$70k

Saber Software

$70k

Intelliswift Software

$70k

The Univ Of Texas Health Science Ctr At Houston

$70k

The Dotcom Team

$70k

Monsanto

$70k

Jass Associates

$70k

Bechtel

$70k

Rcg Information Technology

$70k

Sagarsoft

$70k

Avery Dennison

$70k

Ingersoll Rand

$70k

Pb Americas

$70k

Boden Services

$70k

University Of Chicago

$70k

International Truck And Engine

$70k

Rapidigm

$69k

Sprint United Management

$69k

Brookhaven National Laboratory

$69k

Webilent Technology

$69k

Oracle Financial Services Software

$69k

Lcc International

$69k

Sbc Services

$69k

Itelligence

$69k

Grant Thornton

$69k

Orion Systems Integrators

$69k

Creighton University

$69k

East Carolina University

$69k

West Services

$69k

Carrier

$69k

Trw Automotive

$69k

Albany Molecular Research

$69k

Softsol Resources

$69k

Prokarma

$69k

Siemens Power Generation

$69k

Kpmg

$68k

Ibm India Private

$68k

Net Matrix Solutions

$68k

Ch2m Hill

$68k

Thoughtworks

$68k

Acxiom

$68k

Zensar Technologies

$68k

Majescomastek

$68k

Igate Global Solutions An Igate

$68k

Ajilon Consulting

$68k

Orpine

$68k

Tech Mahindra

$68k

Turner Construction

$68k

Infovision Consultants

$68k

Mindtree Consulting Private

$68k

On Semiconductor

$68k

Information Resources

$68k

The University Of Iowa

$67k

Carnegie Mellon University

$67k

Analysts International

$67k

Igate Mastech Inc An Igate

$67k

Mgl Americas

$67k

Parsons Transportation Group

$67k

Hdr Engineering

$67k

Duke University And Medical Center

$67k

Professional Access

$67k

Dvr Softek

$67k

Super Micro Computer

$67k

The George Washington University

$67k

Cyma Systems

$67k

I Flex Solutions

$66k

Stanford University

$66k

Everest Business Solutions

$66k

Csc Covansys

$66k

Johnson Controls

$66k

Oracle

$66k

Dgn Technologies

$66k

Battelle

$66k

Objectsoft Group

$66k

University Of Connecticut Health Center

$66k

State University Of New York At Buffalo

$66k

Qwest Information Technologies

$66k

Educational Testing Service

$66k

Systime Computer

$66k

West Coast Consulting

$66k

Abercrombie Fitch

$66k

Zolon Tech

$66k

Cdi

$66k

Garmin International

$66k

Malcolm Pirnie

$66k

Wow Global

$66k

Take Solutions

$66k

Prelude Systems

$66k

Objectnet Technologies

$66k

Rush University Medical Center

$66k

International Paper

$66k

Deloitte Touche

$65k

Cognizant Technology Solutions Us

$65k

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

$65k

Deloitte Tax

$65k

Us Technology Resources

$65k

Cyber Resource Group

$65k

Polaris Software Lab

$65k

Urs

$65k

Ness Usa

$65k

University Of Maryland

$65k

Everest Computers

$65k

Saven Technologies

$65k

Asta Crs

$65k

Artech Information Systems

$65k

Empower It

$65k

Hntb

$65k

Microchip Technology

$65k

Onward Technologies

$65k

Watson Wyatt

$65k

Mwh Americas

$65k

Westinghouse Electric

$65k

University Of Wisconsin Milwaukee

$65k

University Corporation For Atmospheric Research

$65k

Quinnox

$65k

Saga Consulting Services

$65k

St Luke S Roosevelt Hospital Center

$65k

Primetech Solutions

$65k

Cybrid

$65k

Ernst Young

$64k

Cummins

$64k

University Of Southern California

$64k

Trustees Of Boston University

$64k

Adaequare

$64k

Environmental Systems Research Institute

$64k

Tech Mahindra Americas

$64k

Attic Technologies

$64k

Perot Systems Tsi America

$64k

Igate Mastech

$64k

Ez2 Technologies

$64k

George Mason University

$64k

The University Of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

$64k

Primus Global Services

$64k

Aspire Systems

$64k

Valuemomentum

$64k

State University Of New York At Stony Brook

$64k

Persistent Systems

$64k

Mastek Dc Offshore Development Co Pvt

$64k

Summitworks Technologies

$64k

Amirit Technologies

$64k

Echosphere

$64k

University Of South Alabama

$64k

Alphavista Services

$64k

Nova Southeastern University

$64k

Wipro

$63k

Marlabs

$63k

Columbia University

$63k

Fedex Corporate Services

$63k

Children S Hospital

$63k

Megasoft Consultants

$63k

Wireless Facilities

$63k

Erp Analysts

$63k

Emory University

$63k

Washington University In St Louis

$63k

Prosoft Technology Group

$63k

Mycom North America

$63k

Global Technical Software Services

$63k

Integral Consulting Services

$63k

Idhasoft

$63k

Novartis Institute For Functional Genomics

$63k

University Of Maryland College Park

$63k

E Business International

$63k

Deegit

$63k

Amicus Systems

$63k

Datec

$63k

University Of California San Francisco

$62k

Ust Global

$62k

University Of California Berkeley

$62k

Progressive Casualty Insurance

$62k

Niit Technologies

$62k

Arizona State University

$62k

University Of Iowa

$62k

Rjt Compuquest

$62k

Everest Consulting Group

$62k

Nationwide Insurance

$62k

Apex Technology Group

$62k

Htc Global Services

$62k

It People

$62k

Camp Dresser Mckee

$62k

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

$62k

Enrich It

$62k

Ez Solutions

$62k

Northeastern University

$62k

Infobahn Softworld

$62k

Techdemocracy

$62k

Lowe S

$62k

Ubics

$62k

Ibm Global Services Igs India Pvt

$62k

Business Integra

$62k

Kohler

$62k

Reliable Software Resources

$62k

Value Consulting

$62k

Sysmind

$62k

Brilliant Software Solutions

$62k

The Ritz Carlton Hotel

$62k

Covansys A Csc

$62k

Mphasis

$61k

Itech Us

$61k

Enterprise Solutions

$61k

Vedicsoft Solutions

$61k

Duke University

$61k

University Of Hawaii

$61k

Software Research Group

$61k

New York Technology Partners

$61k

Temple University

$61k

Scandent Group

$61k

Svam International

$61k

Johns Hopkins University

$61k

University Of Texas Health Science Center At Sa

$61k

Gss America

$61k

Georgia State University

$61k

Mindlance

$61k

Resource Logistics

$61k

University Of California At Santa Barbara

$61k

Cmc Americas

$61k

Paramount Software Solutions

$61k

Mayo Clinic Rochester Mayo Foundation

$61k

Post Buckley Schuh Jernigan

$61k

Horizon Computer Services

$61k

Children S National Medical Center

$61k

Prithvi Information Solutions

$61k

Charter Global

$61k

Compugra Systems

$61k

The University Of Texas At Dallas

$61k

Montage Consignments

$61k

Techorbit

$61k

Vcarve

$61k

Itrendz

$61k

Strategic Systems

$61k

Technology People

$61k

Anira Solutions

$61k

Comprehab

$61k

Lhp Software

$61k

Droisys

$61k

Patni Americas

$60k

University Of Michigan

$60k

Hexaware Technologies

$60k

Covansys

$60k

Verinon Technology Solutions

$60k

Kpit Infosystems

$60k

Ost International

$60k

Wisdom Infotech

$60k

V L S Systems

$60k

Apex Technology Systems

$60k

Software Catalysts

$60k

University Of Texas Medical Branch

$60k

Avco Consulting

$60k

Netxert

$60k

Drexel University

$60k

Global Technology Resources And Solutions

$60k

Technical Strategies

$60k

Fulcrum Logic

$60k

University Of Nevada Las Vegas

$60k

Dice Technologies

$60k

Symphony

$60k

Unified Business Technologies

$60k

Siritek

$60k

Resourcesoft

$60k

Venture Softnet

$60k

Navayuga Infotech

$60k

Logic Planet

$60k

Kelly Services

$60k

The University Of Houston

$60k

Satyam Computer Services

$59k

Hcl America

$59k

Multivision

$59k

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

$59k

Hewitt Associates

$59k

Polaris Software Lab India

$59k

Nutech Information Systems

$59k

Amtex Systems

$59k

Cognizant Technology Solutions

$59k

The University Of Arizona

$59k

Baltimore City Public School System

$59k

Ace Technologies

$59k

Manhattan Associates

$59k

National Instruments

$59k

Us Tech Solutions

$59k

Eclinicalworks

$59k

University Of Notre Dame Du Lac

$59k

Skidmore Owings Merrill

$59k

Universal Software

$59k

Inek Technologies

$59k

Unify Solutions

$59k

Ebusinessware

$59k

Cigniti

$59k

Pace Computer Solutions

$59k

Global Information Systems

$59k

Sriven Systems

$59k

Smart Source Technologies

$59k

Computer Enterprises

$59k

University Of Wisconsin Madison

$59k

Halcyon Solutions

$59k

Peritus

$59k

American Business Solutions

$59k

Rothstein Kass

$59k

Morningstar

$59k

Epace Technologies

$59k

Dsr Management

$59k

Rapidit

$59k

Horizon

$59k

Hellmuth Obata Kassabaum

$59k

Intraedge

$59k

Pegasys Systems Technologies

$59k

Adroit Software Consulting

$59k

Avion Systems

$59k

University Of Texas At Arlington

$59k

University Of New Hampshire

$59k

Reliance Global Services

$59k

International Business Solutions

$59k

Palayekar

$59k

Infosys Technologies

$58k

University Of Florida

$58k

University Of Washington

$58k

Prince George S County Public Schools

$58k

Indiana University

$58k

University Of Kentucky

$58k

Rutgers The State University Of New Jersey

$58k

Globalcynex

$58k

Georgia Institute Of Technology

$58k

Jcg Technologies

$58k

Birlasoft

$58k

Mutex Systems

$58k

Hcl Global Systems

$58k

Black Veatch

$58k

Lsu Health Sciences Center

$58k

Ppd Development

$58k

Usm Business Systems

$58k

Yash Lujan Consulting

$58k

Syntel

$58k

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

$58k

Alphasoft Services

$58k

Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania

$58k

Softwareart

$58k

Virgo

$58k

R Systems

$58k

Partners Healthcare System

$58k

Kaizen Technologies

$58k

Real Soft

$58k

Supreme Soft

$58k

Techno Soft

$58k

Smart Information Management Systems

$58k

Intellisoft Technologies

$58k

Lehigh University

$58k

Aequor Technologies

$58k

Unc Charlotte

$58k

Corpus

$58k

Sriven Infosys

$58k

Natsoft

$58k

Infovision Technologies

$58k

Cgn Associates

$58k

Mbt International

$58k

Global It

$58k

Tata Consultancy Services

$57k

Harvard University

$57k

University Of Minnesota

$57k

Diaspark

$57k

The Trustees Of Princeton University

$57k

American Unit

$57k

University Of Connecticut

$57k

Tulane University

$57k

The University Of Texas Medical Branch

$57k

Univ Of Maryland Baltimore

$57k

Satya Marg Solutions

$57k

Hytech Consulting

$57k

S2tech

$57k

St Jude Children S Research Hospital

$57k

The Johns Hopkins University

$57k

Nihaki Systems

$57k

Xenosoft Technologies

$57k

University Of Medicine Dentistry Of New Jersey

$57k

Infowave Systems

$57k

International Solutions Group

$57k

Zeninfotech

$57k

Svk Systems

$57k

Credent Technologies

$57k

International Technology Solutions

$57k

Trinuc

$57k

Minecode

$57k

Oak Ridge Associated Universities

$57k

Astir It Solutions

$57k

Maimonides Medical Center

$57k

Sysnet Technology Solutions

$57k

University Of California Santa Cruz

$57k

Bahwan Cybertek

$57k

First Object

$57k

Etek It Services

$57k

Infokall

$57k

Radiant Systems

$57k

University Of New Mexico

$57k

Illinois Institute Of Technology

$57k

Webject Systems

$57k

R Square

$57k

Systelinc

$57k

Yale University

$56k

University Of California Davis

$56k

Massachusetts Institute Of Technology

$56k

Mount Sinai Medical Center

$56k

Purdue University

$56k

Objectwin Technology

$56k

Divihn Integration

$56k

Technosoft

$56k

Surya Systems

$56k

West Virginia University

$56k

Delasoft

$56k

University Of Houston

$56k

Magna Infotech

$56k

International Systems Technologies

$56k

Global Consultant

$56k

Numbers Only

$56k

Premier It Solutions

$56k

The University Of Toledo

$56k

Gantec

$56k

Jean Martin

$56k

University Of Maryland Baltimore

$56k

Libsys

$56k

Amatel

$56k

University Of Massachusetts Amherst

$56k

Laconia Associates

$56k

Systems People

$56k

St Jude Childrens Research Hospital

$56k

Object Technology Solutions

$56k

Quintegra Solutions

$56k

Comtec Consultants

$56k

The Children S Hospital Of Philadelphia

$56k

New Jersey Institute Of Technology

$56k

Sify

$56k

Nexage Technologies Usa

$56k

Vensiti

$56k

Trinity Consulting

$56k

Fortune Technologies

$56k

Techpeak

$56k

Globaldata Management

$56k

Openwave Computing

$56k

Dynpro

$56k

Softpath System

$56k

Larsen Toubro Infotech

$55k

University Of California Los Angeles

$55k

University Of Illinois At Chicago

$55k

American Solutions

$55k

University Of California San Diego

$55k

Cornell University

$55k

Wayne State University

$55k

Texas A M University

$55k

Jsmn International

$55k

University Of Rochester

$55k

University Of Utah

$55k

Proficient Business Systems

$55k

Xpedite Technologies

$55k

Virginia Tech

$55k

International Education Services

$55k

Integrated Software Solutions

$55k

Bilinguals

$55k

University Of Louisville

$55k

Techgene Solutions

$55k

Pacific West

$55k

The Brandon Group

$55k

Teksoft

$55k

Infinite Computing Systems

$55k

University Of Kansas Medical Center

$55k

Larsen Toubro

$55k

Pyramid Technology Solutions

$55k

Niit Usa

$55k

Diverse Lynx

$55k

University Of Wyoming

$55k

Rite Pros

$55k

Hd Dimension

$55k

Wright State University

$55k

Premier Technologies

$55k

Us Software

$55k

University Of Nevada In Reno

$55k

Altsoft

$55k

Iappz Solutions

$55k

Pax International

$55k

Symbol Software Services

$55k

Digital Globalsoft

$55k

Kennesaw State University

$55k

University Of Pennsylvania

$54k

University Of Illinois

$54k

Michigan State University

$54k

California Institute Of Technology

$54k

New York University School Of Medicine

$54k

University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

$54k

University Of Colorado

$54k

Isr Info Way

$54k

Technology Consultants

$54k

Florida International University

$54k

Fourth Technologies

$54k

Pyramid Consulting

$54k

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

$54k

Advansoft International

$54k

University Of Oregon

$54k

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

$54k

Terra Infotech

$54k

Vensai Technologies

$54k

Indsoft

$54k

Albert Einstein Medical Center

$54k

Inforide Technologies

$54k

Sunmerge Systems

$54k

Zylog Systems

$54k

Yorkia Group

$54k

Logicsoft

$54k

Anjani Etech Solutions

$54k

Ntrust Infotech Private

$54k

Radiant Softsol

$54k

Pharmaceutics International

$54k

Sage It

$54k

Strategic Resources International

$54k

Henry M Jackson Foundation

$54k

Globalways

$54k

The University Of Chicago

$53k

Ik Solutions

$53k

University Of Cincinnati

$53k

Interpro

$53k

University Of Central Florida

$53k

Advent Global Solutions

$53k

Luceo

$53k

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

$53k

Dartmouth College

$53k

Redsalsa Technologies

$53k

Clerysys

$53k

Weill Cornell Medical College

$53k

Coolsoft

$53k

Tekstrom

$53k

Vaktech

$53k

Ved Software Services

$53k

Brown University

$53k

Indus Valley Consultants

$53k

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center

$53k

Ecom Consulting

$53k

Exec Search

$53k

Florida Atlantic University

$53k

The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

$53k

Vaptech

$53k

Children S Hospital Of Philadelphia

$53k

Enternet Business Systems

$53k

Ecom Solutions

$53k

Software Solutions Group

$53k

Imetris

$53k

Pr Consultants

$53k

Ssinfotek

$53k

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

$53k

Z3 Technologies

$53k

Eureka Technocrats

$53k

United Information Technology

$53k

Anid Infosoft

$53k

John H Stroger Jr Hospital Of Cook County

$53k

New York Medical College

$53k

Synova

$53k

Dynamic Software Consultants

$53k

Omnisoft

$53k

Patni Computer Systems

$52k

Northwestern University

$52k

The Pennsylvania State University

$52k

Vanderbilt University

$52k

Yash Technologies

$52k

University Of California Irvine

$52k

First Tek Technologies

$52k

Smartsoft International

$52k

The University Of Texas At Austin

$52k

Paradigm Infotech

$52k

Semafor Technologies

$52k

University Of South Florida

$52k

The Rockefeller University

$52k

Howard University

$52k

Colorado State University

$52k

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

$52k

Virtue Group

$52k

Maxisit

$52k

Makro Technologies

$52k

General Hospital

$52k

Viraj

$52k

Clemson University

$52k

Bramha Infotech

$52k

Highdata Software

$52k

Northern Illinois University

$52k

Wichita State University

$52k

Fontana Unified School District

$52k

Slutzker Center For International Services

$52k

The University Of Alabama

$52k

South Dakota State University

$52k

The Ohio State University

$51k

Massachusetts General Hospital

$51k

Cyberthink

$51k

Brigham And Women S Hospital

$51k

System Soft Technologies

$51k

Georgetown University

$51k

Camo Technologies

$51k

Florida State University

$51k

Tata Infotech

$51k

Public Health Trust

$51k

Vensoft

$51k

Amsol

$51k

Infomerica

$51k

Corporate Computer Services

$51k

Oregon State University

$51k

North Dakota State University

$51k

University Of Kansas

$51k

International Business Software Solutions

$51k

Tufts University

$51k

Ibm Global Services India Pvt

$51k

University Of Arizona

$51k

Yash Solutions

$51k

Kent State University

$51k

Infodat International

$51k

Triton Information Technologies

$51k

Rtkl Associates

$51k

Vision Tech Solutions

$51k

Systel Inc Of Delaware

$51k

The University Of Texas Pan American

$51k

Datamatics America

$51k

Logic Soft

$51k

Lodestar Systems

$51k

New Mexico State University

$51k

Proteam

$51k

Softnet Solutions

$51k

Baylor College Of Medicine

$50k

Emory University Human Resources

$50k

Case Western Reserve University

$50k

Oregon Health Science University

$50k

University Of California Riverside

$50k

Louisiana State University

$50k

Johns Hopkins University The Medical Institutions

$50k

American Information Technology

$50k

Allied Business Consulting

$50k

Dibon Solutions

$50k

Computech

$50k

Miami University

$50k

West Contra Costa Unified School District

$50k

Xtreme Worldwide Solutions

$50k

The University Of Memphis

$50k

The University Of Akron

$50k

Lekha

$50k

Grand Valley State University

$50k

Depaul University

$50k

University Of Virginia

$49k

The University Of Tennessee

$49k

Vision Systems Group

$49k

Orionsoft

$49k

University Of Oklahoma

$49k

Genome International

$49k

Bd Of Regents Univ Sys Ga Obo Medical College Ga

$49k

The Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions

$49k

Gensler

$49k

Epower

$49k

Nexeon International

$49k

Auburn University

$49k

Netsoft Technologies

$49k

Brandeis University

$49k

The University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

$49k

Kraftware

$49k

University Of North Dakota

$49k

Temple University Hospital

$49k

North Carolina State University

$48k

University Of Massachusetts Medical School

$48k

The University Of Georgia

$48k

The Scripps Research Institute

$48k

Kansas State University

$48k

Texas Tech University

$48k

Cambridge Resource Group

$48k

Hcl Technologies America

$48k

Kindred Rehab Services

$48k

Magna Systems International

$48k

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

$48k

Ohio University

$48k

Pfpc Inc A Subsidiary Of The Pnc Financial Serv

$48k

Los Angeles Unified School District

$48k

Materials Software System

$48k

Ifuturistics

$48k

The University Of Vermont

$48k

Nexus Software Solutions

$48k

Global Professional Healthcare Providers

$48k

Uhcp

$48k

University Of Texas At San Antonio

$48k

Terasoft International

$48k

Tufts New England Medical Center

$48k

Washington State University

$47k

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

$47k

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

$47k

Weill Medical College Of Cornell University

$47k

Virginia Commonwealth University

$47k

Mississippi State University

$47k

Worldwide Software Services

$47k

The University Of Mississippi

$47k

Soft Computer Consultants

$47k

Ramsoft Sytems

$47k

Axiom Systems

$47k

University Of Idaho

$47k

The University Of Southern Mississippi

$47k

The Salk Institute For Biological Studies

$47k

Iowa State University Of Science And Technology

$47k

V Soft Consulting Group

$46k

Iowa State University Of Science Technology

$46k

Albert Einstein College Of Medicine Of Yeshiva Uni

$46k

Hidef Technologies

$46k

University Of Arkansas

$46k

University Of Medicine And Dentistry Of New Jersey

$46k

New York City Department Of Education

$46k

Allied Informatics

$46k

East Baton Rouge Parish School System

$46k

The University Of South Carolina

$46k

Advanced Professional Marketing

$46k

International Faculty Scholar Services

$46k

Cyber World Solutions

$46k

Sqa Labs

$46k

Fox Chase Cancer Center

$46k

Intelli Infotek

$46k

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Research Institute

$46k

Burnham Institute For Medical Research

$46k

Syntel Consulting

$46k

University Of Pittsburgh

$45k

Cosmos Foundation

$45k

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

$45k

University Of Nebraska Lincoln

$45k

University Of Delaware

$45k

Medical University Of South Carolina And Affiliate

$45k

University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

$45k

University Of Missouri Columbia

$45k

Hahnemann University Hospital

$45k

New York City Public Schools

$45k

Beckman Research Institute

$45k

Indiana U Purdue U Indianapolis

$44k

Dallas Independent School District

$44k

Thomas Jefferson University

$44k

Alief Independent School District

$44k

Usp

$44k

Research Foundation Of Cuny

$44k

Children S Hospital Harvard University

$44k

Univ Of Ala At Birmingham Uab

$43k

Garland Independent School District

$43k

Bidmc Harvard University

$43k

Oklahoma State University

$43k

Billie Freelon

$43k

Nishimoto Trading

$43k

Univ Of Texas Southwestern Medical Ctr Dallas

$42k

Panda Express

$42k

Research Foundation Of The State University Of Ny

$42k

Enterprise Rent A Car

$42k

Irving Independent School District

$42k

Galena Park Independent School District

$42k

The Wistar Institute Of Anatomy And Biology

$42k

Univ Of Tx Southwestern Med Ctr At Dallas

$42k

Fort Bend Independent School District

$42k

Research Foundation Of Suny

$42k

The University Of Tennessee Health Science Center

$41k

Aldine Independent School District

$41k

Houston Independent School District

$41k

University Of South Carolina

$40k

Lsu Agricultural Center

$40k

Columbia Sussex

$38k

Gtrr

$37k

 

이 자료는 'the United States Deprartment of Labor'(미국 노동부)가 공개한 임금 자료를 바탕으로, 'jobs-salary.com'이 정리한 내용입니다.

 

 


맞춤검색

,

김문수씨가 경기도 규제완화 벤치마킹 사례로 'STX조선해양'을 들고 있는데 전혀 적절하지 않다.

이 점에서 경기도지사 후보로 나온 김문수씨의 안목은 뭔가 문제가 있는게 아닌가 심각하게 의심이 간다.

왜 그런가?

조선업은 '규제완화'의 적절한 사례로 볼 수 없기 때문이다.

조선해양 업종은 대표적인 '노동집약 산업'이다.

처음부터 끝까지 노동력으로 시작해서, 노동력으로 끝난다고 해도 과언이 아니다.

조선업은 엄청난 장치산업인 것도 분명하지만, 노동자들이 일일히 손을 써야할 만큼 대부분의 공정이 수작업으로 이루어진다.



그렇다면 STX조선해양(067250)을 비롯한 조선업 기업들은 왜 중국으로 진출하고 있을까?

당연하다. 노동력의 인건비가 싸기 때문이다.

대우조선해양(042660)도 최근 수 년내에 중국에 공장을 짓고 진출한 바 있는데, 같은 이유다.


그렇다면 중국 노동자의 노동력의 질은 우수할까?

한국의 숙련 노동자들보다는 당연히 수준이 떨어질 것이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 진출하는 이유는 무엇인가?

기업들은 노동력의 질적 저화와 임금 비용 절감 효과를 상쇄하여 계산에 넣고 애초에 중국 진출을 결정하는 것이다.


한편, 중국 진출 조선업 기업 사례를 경기도 도정과 연결짓는 김문수 후보의 예시는 '경기도' 측면에서도 전혀 설득력이 없다. 

왜냐하면 경기도는 '조선 해양업종'과 전혀 무관한 지역으로 볼 수 있기 때문이다. 

국내의 대부분의 조선업은 경남권(울산, 부산, 거제 등)에 집중되어 있고, 부분적으로 남해안, 전라권역에 분포하고 있다. 

현대중공업 군산조선소



최근에는 현대중공업이 군산 산업단지 지역에 '군산 조선소'를 건설하고 일부 공장을 진출시키긴 했지만, 보조적 수준이다. 
그리고 새만금 인근 군산 산업 단지 지역에는 여전히 놀고 있는 땅의 규모가 어마어마하다. 그런데 군산은 전라북도다. 


특히 조선업은 해안 지형을 특히 고려하여 입지를 선정하게 된다.
왜냐하면 국내 조선업은 배를 바다에서 건설하는 '도크'형 건조법을 취하고 있기 때문이다. 

조선업은 풍부한 대지, 값싼 노동력, 유리한 해안 지형을 필요로 한다. 이런 면에서 경기도의 입지는 조선업과 아예 거리가 멀다. 경기도는 서울을 둘러싸서 땅값이 애초에 비싸기 때문에, '대지 변수' 하나만 놓고 봐도, 아예 '조선업'의 접근이 용이하지 않다.

다시 정리하면,
1. 조선업은 경기도 규제완화의 내용과 산업 특성이 전혀 관련이 없다.
2. 조선업 일부 기업들이 부분적인 추가공장을 중국에 건설하는 것은 '인건비' 요인이 가장 크다. 
3. 경기도는 해안 지형의 특성이나 대지 조성 비용 측면에서 조선업의 경쟁력이 애초에 없다. 
4. 조선업 추가 후보 부지를 본다면, 군산 산업 단지에 여전히 어마어마한 땅이 놀고 있다. 

그러므로 김문수씨는 STX조선해양을 비롯한 조선업을 더 이상 경기도 규제완화 벤치마킹 사례로 언급하지 말아야 할 것이다.

전혀 설득력이 없기 때문이다.




맞춤검색

,

2010년의 세번째 베이지북인 4월호 'Beige Book'이 4월 14일(현지) 미국에서 발표되었습니다.

베이지북(Beige Book)은 미국의 경제상황, 경기동향을 보여주는 대표적인 경제지표로 미국 연방준비은행(FRB, Federal Reserve Bank)가 연간 8회 작성하여 공개합니다.

2010녀 4월호는 올 해의 3번째 베이지북으로, 1월 13일, 3월 3일(현지)에 각각 1, 2호가 발행된 바 있습니다.

이번 4월호 보고서의 주요 내용을 보면,

"지난 보고서 이후로 모든 지역의 경제 활동의 개선되고 있다. (세인트루이스 제외) 
소매 판매와 자동차 판매도 늘어나고 있고, 관광산업도 개선되고 있다.
제조업 경기도 개선세에 있다.

주택착공과 주거용 부동산 시장을 비롯한 주택 경기, 건설 경기도 개선의 조짐이 보인다.
반면에 상업용 부동산은 여전히 약세에 머물러 있다.

노동시장은 여전히 약세이지만, 임금 상승 압박은 최소한에 머물러 있고,
소매 물가도 여전히 안정적이다."

위와 같은 내용으로 보고하여, 미국의 경기가 전 지역에서 개선세를 보이고 있음을 분명하게 했습니다. 



* 전미경제조사국(NBER, National Bureau of Economic Research)는 2007년 12월부터 미국 경제가 '침체기'에 빠져들었다고 이미 선언한 바 있는데, 아직까지 '회복세'로 전환했다고 밝히지 않았습니다. 그런데 해당 자료에 의하면, 미국의 1945년부터 2001년까지 '경기 침체기'의 평균 지속기간은 10개월이라고 하는데, 현재의 침체 기간은 벌써 28개월이 넘어서고 있습니다.
(관련글, 미국 경제 침체기의 평균 지속기간)

그래서 NBER이 미국 경제침체기의 종료를 공식 선언할 날도 얼마 남지 않은거 같네요.

이러한 영향으로 미국 다우지수(다우존스 지수, DJIA)는 이날 큰 폭으로 올랐습니다.



베이지북(Beige Book)은 미국 지역 연방은행들이 수집한 미국 12개 지역의 경기동향을 요약한 자료입니다.
이 자료는 미국 경제상황과 동향을 실시간으로 보여주는 핵심지표로 FRB가 직접 발표합니다.

이들 12개 지역을 보면, Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, San Francisco 입니다. (보스톤, 뉴욕, 필라델피아, 클리브랜드, 리치몬드, 아틀란타, 사카고, 세인트루이스, 미네아폴리스, 캔사스시티, 댈라스, 샌프라시스코)

다음 베이지북은 2010년 6월 9일(미국 현지)에 발표됩니다.

한편, 국내의 경우에도 코스피 지수가 먼저 움직인 감은 있으나, 2010년 연초의 시초가 1700p 부근에 4월 초반의 지수도 머물러 있기 때문에, 앞으로 연간 고점을 향해서는 여전히 상승의 폭이 열려있다고 볼 수 있겠습니다.

[관련글] 
주식시장 지수 변동성의 이해  /  주식투자 몇 월부터 하는게 좋을까?  /  주식투자 반드시 해야 하나? 
이효리 주식 투자 실패, 연예인 주식투자 10개 지침


첨부 : FRB 베이지북 2010년 4월호 보고서 요약 전문 (2010.04.14 Beige Book)

Summary 요약

Prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and based on information collected before April 5, 2010. This document summarizes comments received from business and other contacts outside the Federal Reserve System and is not a commentary on the views of Federal Reserve officials.

요약 전문

Overall economic activity increased somewhat since the last report across all Federal Reserve Districts except St. Louis, which reported "softened" economic conditions. Districts generally reported increases in retail sales and vehicle sales. Tourism spending was up in a number of Districts. Reports on the services sector were generally mixed. Manufacturing activity increased in all Districts except St. Louis, and new orders were up. Many Districts reported increased activity in housing markets from low levels. Commercial real estate market activity remained very weak in most Districts. Activity in the banking and finance sector was mixed in a number of Districts, as loan volumes and credit quality decreased. Agricultural conditions were mixed as well, with positive conditions reported in Districts from the central and western parts of the country, while negative conditions were reported in the mid and southern Atlantic Districts. Mining and energy production and exploration increased for metals, oil and wind.

While labor markets generally remained weak, some hiring activity was evident, particularly for temporary staff. Wage pressures were characterized as minimal or contained. Retail prices generally remained level, but some input prices increased.

세부 항목

Consumer Spending and Tourism  소비자 소비, 관광
District reports indicated that consumer spending increased during the reporting period. New York and Cleveland reported that recent sales strengthened, while sales rebounded in Richmond and Kansas City. Slight sales gains were reported in Philadelphia. Retail sales in San Francisco continued to improve, but remained somewhat sluggish on net. In St. Louis several new establishments opened, particularly in the food industry. Several Districts described consumers as somewhat more confident. Businesses were cautiously optimistic regarding future sales: Cleveland, Atlanta, Kansas City and Dallas noted that retailers expect sales to improve during the upcoming months. Sales of home furnishings and electronic goods increased in a number of Districts, while seasonal apparel sales were up in New York, Philadelphia and Kansas City. New York and Minneapolis noted that shopping by Canadians was strong at businesses near the border. Atlanta reported that retailers continued to keep inventory levels lower than normal, and retailers in New York reported that inventories are in very good shape.

Vehicle sales improved in a number of Districts during March. New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Dallas and San Francisco noted that auto sales picked up in recent weeks. Cleveland described sales as decent, while sales were steady in Kansas City and mixed in Richmond. Several Districts noted that favorable pricing and credit terms helped lure buyers into showrooms. Dealers in Philadelphia indicated that they expect sales to increase during the next few months.

Tourism conditions also improved during the reporting period. New York, Richmond, Chicago, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco pointed to signs of increased tourism activity. Tourism was described as stable in most parts of the Atlanta District. Hotel occupancy rates were rising in New York, Chicago, Kansas City, and San Francisco. Reports on room rates were mixed: New York and Kansas City noted increases, while Chicago reported rate cuts, particularly at luxury hotels. Managers at mountain resorts in the Richmond District reported that this winter was one of their best ski seasons ever. However, Atlanta noted that corporate bookings remained at very low levels at some high-end resorts.

Nonfinancial Services  비농업 서비스
Business services were mixed, with some signs of economic recovery. Boston and Minneapolis reported increased activity. Richmond and Dallas were mixed, while San Francisco said demand remained lackluster. St. Louis reported that the sector continued to decline. Advertising and consulting firms in Boston said demand is up substantially from the first quarter of 2009, while an advertising contact in Richmond and professional media services firms in San Francisco characterized sales as flat at low levels. Dallas reported sluggish demand for nontax-related accounting and legal services. Law firms in Minneapolis specializing in debt collections and bankruptcy saw strong demand, while a Richmond property manager noted a large number of repossessions.

Manufacturing   제조업
Manufacturing activity increased since the last report across most of the country, with all Districts other than St. Louis reporting increases in orders, shipments, or production. Boston, Cleveland, Chicago, Dallas and San Francisco reported positive results in metals and fabrication. Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta and Chicago reported increased auto or auto component production. Boston, Richmond, Dallas, and San Francisco saw increased production in electronic, computers or high-technology goods. Chicago and Minneapolis saw increased production of energy-related products. However, for construction-related goods, Chicago and Dallas reported mixed conditions, Boston reported flat activity and St. Louis reported decreases. Overall, St. Louis saw more plant closures than plant openings.

Banking and Finance   은행 금융 
Bank lending activity was mixed by category in most Districts. Atlanta, St. Louis and Kansas City saw weaker loan demand across categories, while activity in San Francisco was flat at low levels and Dallas said that demand appears to be stabilizing. Demand for consumer credit decreased in New York and increased slightly in Philadelphia. Most banks in Cleveland reported weak consumer loan demand, although a few contacts saw a slight increase due to seasonal factors. Business and industrial loan volumes decreased in Philadelphia, Cleveland and Chicago and were flat in New York. San Francisco noted continued modest gains in venture capital funding.

Credit standards remained generally unchanged across the nation, while credit quality was mixed. New York, Cleveland and Kansas City reported tighter lending standards for commercial mortgages. In Atlanta several business contacts reported difficulty getting credit. Dallas and San Francisco said standards continued to be tight. New York saw increased delinquency rates for all categories except consumer loans, which were flat. Philadelphia and Richmond saw little change in credit quality, while Cleveland was mixed. Dallas reported that credit quality was either stabilizing or improving, and appeared to have turned a corner. Chicago noted an improvement in consumer and business loan quality, although credit quality for many small firms continued to decline.

Real Estate and Construction  부동산 건설
Residential real estate activity increased, albeit from low levels, in most Districts, with the exceptions of St. Louis, where it was mixed, and San Francisco, where it was flat. Contacts in Philadelphia, Cleveland and Kansas City expressed concern about whether sales would continue to grow after the expiration of the first-time home buyer tax credit. New York, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco noted sluggish sales for high-end homes. Home prices were stable across most Districts, but decreased in parts of the New York and Atlanta Districts. Residential construction activity increased slightly in New York, Atlanta, St. Louis, Minneapolis and Dallas, but remained weak in Cleveland, Chicago and San Francisco.

Commercial real estate activity was slow across the nation. Notable exceptions were Richmond, which saw an uptick in commercial leasing, and Dallas, where the sector was mixed and might be nearing bottom. In Boston, leasing activity consists largely of renewals, with many renewing tenants leasing less space. Manhattan Class A office rents were down 20 percent to 25 percent year over year. Contacts in Philadelphia, Richmond, Kansas City and Dallas expressed concern that lease concessions from landlords were putting downward pressure on rents. Commercial construction continued to be weak in most Districts. Cleveland saw some development in the energy and industrial segments.

Agriculture and Natural Resources  농업 천연자원
Districts reported mixed results in agriculture. Atlanta reported that cold weather negatively affected crop conditions. Richmond, Kansas City, and Dallas noted that wet conditions delayed planting, though Dallas also commented that current soil moisture levels will be beneficial for the growing season. Chicago expected a normal planting schedule. Minneapolis and San Francisco indicated favorable weather conditions. The calving season is doing well in the Minneapolis District, but Chicago and Minneapolis noted softening dairy output prices.

Activity in the energy and mining sectors increased since the last report. Philadelphia, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco saw increases in oil exploration. Coal production was mixed in the Philadelphia District and increased in the Kansas City District. In the Minneapolis District, more wind energy projects are planned, and mining activity increased.

Employment, Wages, and Prices  고용, 임금, 물가
While overall labor markets remained weak, some hiring activity was evident, particularly for temporary staff. Employment in the manufacturing and services sectors in Boston remained relatively unchanged, while very little hiring occurred at major legal and financial firms in New York. In the Richmond District, job cuts subsided at retail businesses, and employment was stable at most other services firms. In Kansas City overall employment levels held steady, but more manufacturers and several energy-related firms planned to increase payrolls. Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, and Chicago reported strong demand for temporary workers. A pickup in employment was noted in the manufacturing sector by Cleveland, with little change in staffing for retail, energy, transportation and banking. Atlanta noted that many businesses continued to increase hours worked for existing staff. Minneapolis reported that while labor markets remained weak, some signs of hiring were noted.

Wage pressures were characterized as minimal or contained. In Boston, most firms reported instituting or planning to institute modest wage increases of 2 percent to 3 percent in 2010, while performance bonuses in the services sector were generally down. Richmond reported that average wages edged higher in March in the services sector, but declined slightly in manufacturing. Most companies hiring new workers in the Kansas City District were not offering higher salaries to attract qualified applicants. Dallas reported that just a handful of firms were planning on partially reinstating employer matches to retirement plans or giving small pay increases. In Chicago wage pressures were minimal; however, an increase in health-care costs was noted. San Francisco also reported significant increases in the costs of employee benefits, such as health insurance and pensions.

Retail prices generally remained level, but some input prices increased. Where producers faced cost pressures on inputs, they were largely unable to pass those prices downstream to selling prices, although in Kansas City some manufacturers were considering raising selling prices due to higher raw materials costs. In Boston retail vendor and selling prices were stable. Philadelphia reported that prices of most goods and services have been steady, although there were increased reports of rising prices for basic materials and construction-related products. Apart from rising prices for steel and petroleum-based products in Cleveland, raw materials and product pricing were generally stable. Richmond noted moderate price increases in the manufacturing and services sectors. Chicago reported upward pressure on prices for plywood, industrial metals and petroleum-based fuels. In the Dallas District prices of chemicals and related products rose sharply, primarily due to plant outages. Natural gas prices slipped during the reporting period because of continued high levels of production, low industrial demand and the end of the winter season. Richmond and San Francisco reported increased overseas shipping costs.

2010
January

13

HTML

273 KB PDF


February


March

3

HTML

925 KB PDF


April

14

HTML

683 KB PDF


May


June

9



July

28



August


September

8



October

20



November


December

1



2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996

1970 - present (on the web site of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis)



맞춤검색

,

각종 통계지표를 확인하려면 어떤 사이트를 방문하면 될까요?

통계청에서는 '국가통계포털', 'Kosis.kr'을 운영하여, 각종 국내, 국제 통계지표 검색 기능을 제공하고 있습니다.

특히 최근에는 "KOSIS 국가통계포털이 고객중심의 이용 편이성 제고를 위해 통계자료 검색, 분석 기능 강화,탐색경로 간소화 등 다양한 기능을 개발 및 개선하여, 2010년 3월 30일부터 새롭게 개편된 내용으로 서비스를 실시한다"고 밝혔네요.

그래서 방문해서 확인해 본 바에 따르면, 인터페이스나 검색 환경이 부드럽게 바뀐 것을 알 수 있습니다.


여기서는 '북한통계포털'에서 남북한 자료도 비교해 볼 수 있었는데, 최근에는 '지도로 보는 e-지방지표'가 강화되는 등, 지방별 통계자료 검색 기능도 크게 보강한 거 같네요. (국가통계포털 - http://KOSIS.kr)

통계청이 밝히는 주요 업데이트 내용을 보면, 

 o 디자인 및 메뉴체계 개선
     - 고객이 원하는 서비스를 쉽게 찾을 수 있도록 메뉴체계 재구성
     - 홈페이지 디자인을 KOSIS 주요기능 및 콘텐츠 중심으로 직관적인 화면으로 구성
     - 사이드텝 기능을 새롭게 도입하여, 통계표 접근경로 간소화

 o 통계정보의 시각화로 한 눈에 알 수 있는 서비스 제공
     - 한국의 주요지표, 경기순환시계, e-지방지표 등

 o 자료검색 및 분석 편이성 제고
     - 조회범위, 자료선택 등을 직관적으로 재배치하여 상세자료를 찾아보기 쉽도록 개선 
     - 초기통계표를 사용자가 변경후 재조회시 설정정보가 유지되도록 개선 
 
    - 통계표와 관련된 디지털간행물, 보도자료 등 연계정보 추가 
     - 통계표 주기(월, 분기, 년)와 시점 다중 선택 동시 조회 가능

 o 통계표 스크랩 기능 강화
     - 사용자 변경한 형태의 통계표도 스크랩하여 저장할 수 있도록 기능 개선
       (주기시점 선택, 피봇형태, 분석기능 등을 저장 가능)

 o 웹접근성 향상을 통한 이용자 만족도 제고
     - 다양한 웹브라우저 지원(※ 윈도우즈계열 운영체제(OS)에서 사용가능)

등을 들고 있습니다.

국민들이 국제통계나 국내통계 수치에 대한 접근이 쉬어지면, 정책 수립이나 집행, 검토 과정이 효율화됩니다. 정보가 공개되니까 함께 지혜를 짜내볼 수도 있습니다.

그리고 방문자들이 원하는 정보를 제공하여 각종 통계 지표의 궁금증을 풀어줄 수도 있습니다.

실례로 아래 자료들은 국가통계포털(KOSIS.kr)의 통계자료를 직간접적으로 활용하여 살펴본 내용들입니다.

경기선행지수, 경기동행지수, 경기후행지수 (예)
한국인의 키, 가장 빨리 커지고 있다 
국내 실업률 추이 _1999~2009
서울이 가장 잘 살까? 국내 일인당 지역내 총생산
경기선행지수 확인하는 방법 _kosis.kr
한국, 경제성장률 추이 및 OECD 국가간 비교

국가통계포털은 수집과 공개가 가능한 국내 대부분의 통계 자료를 제공하고 있습니다.
해외 국제자료의 경우에도 'OECD'와 같이 연동 가능한 자료는 이 곳에서도 검색이 가능합니다.


주제별로 제공하는 지표별 통계를 보면,
인구, 가구, 고용, 노동, 임금, 물가, 가계, 보건, 사회, 복지, 환경, 농림어업, 광공업, 에너지, 건설, 주택, 토지, 교통, 정보통신, 도소매, 서비스, 경기, 기업경영, 국민계정, 지역계정, 국가자산, 재정, 금융, 보험, 무역, 외환, 국제수지, 교육, 문화, 과학, 행정 등 거의 모든 수집 통계자료를 공개하고 있습니다.

국가통계포털을 많이 활용하면 수치화된 정보를 손쉽게 얻을 수 있네요.

얼마전에 크게 주목을 받은 '통계로 보는 자화상' 서비스도 여기서 제공하고 있습니다.

이용방법은 실제 홈페이지를 방문해서 원하는 정보를 찾아보면 금방 알 수 있습니다.

처음 사용자를 위해서는
http://kosis.kr/nsp/help/helpView.jsp 에서 따로 플래시로 안내하고 있네요.

국가통계포털은 경제성장률, GDP, 국민소득, 물가와 같은 경제지표는 물론 각종 사회 관련 지표도 확인할 수 있습니다.
방문하여 궁금한 통계를 찾아보면 재미난 경험이 될 것입니다.


[관련글] 통계청, 통계로 보는 자화상 서비스를 이용하려면? _kosis.kr



맞춤검색

,


미국 FRB의 베이지북, Beige Book 2009년 9월호가, 9월 9일(현지) 발표되었습니다.
베이지북은 미국의 경제상황, 경기동향을 보여주는 주요지표로 연간 8회 작성, 공개되는데, 2009년 여섯번째에 해당합니다.

이번 베이지북에서 FRB는 미국 경기가 "개선을 보이고 있다"고 확실하게 언급하였습니다.

"경제활동은 더욱 안정화되었고, 개선의 신호들이 나타나고 있으며,
재고는 소비와 대등하고 관리되고 있고,있으며, 주택시장은 개선조짐이 나타나고 있다. 한편, 산업생산도 개선이 나타나고 있다.
반면에, 임금 상승압박은 최소한으로 유지되고 있고, 소비자 물가도 안정적"이라고 밝혔습니다.


베이지북은 미국 12개 각 지역 연방은행들이 수집한 미국 12개 지역의 경기동향을 요약한 자료로,
미국 경제상황을 보여주는 핵심지표로 작용하며, 연방준비은행 FRB, Federal Reserve Bank 가 발표합니다.

이들 12개 지역은 Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, San Francisco 입니다.
(보스톤, 뉴욕, 필라델피아, 클리브랜드, 리치몬드, 아틀란타, 사카고, 세인트루이스, 미네아폴리스,
캔사스시티, 댈라스, 샌프라시스코)

다음 베이지북은 10월 21일, 12월 2일 발표될 예정입니다. 2009년 올해 베이지북 발표 일정은 앞으로 2회 남았습니다.


첨부 : FRB 베이지북 보고서 전문 파일 (2009.09.09 Beige Book)


Summary

Prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and based on information collected before August 31, 2009. This document summarizes comments received from businesses and other contacts outside the Federal Reserve and is not a commentary on the views of Federal Reserve officials.

전문요지

Reports from the 12 Federal Reserve Districts indicate that economic activity continued to stabilize in July and August. Relative to the last report, Dallas indicated that economic activity had firmed, while Boston, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Richmond, and San Francisco mentioned signs of improvement. Atlanta, Chicago, Kansas City, Minneapolis, and New York generally described economic activity as stable or showing signs of stabilization; St. Louis remarked that the pace of decline appeared to be moderating. Most Districts noted that the outlook for economic activity among their business contacts remained cautiously positive.

경제활동은 더욱 안정화되었고, 개선의 신호들이 나타나고 있다.

The majority of Districts reported flat retail sales. Richmond, Philadelphia, Chicago, Atlanta, and Boston remarked that retailers continued to carefully manage inventories, keeping them in line with low sales levels. A majority of Districts confirmed that the "cash-for-clunkers" program boosted traffic and sales. Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, and Minneapolis also noted increases or planned increases in automobile-related production. Most regions reported some improvement in residential real estate markets. Downward pressure on home prices continued in most Districts, although Dallas and New York noted that local prices were firming. Reports on commercial real estate suggest that the demand for space remained weak and that nonresidential construction-related activity continued to decline. San Francisco, Philadelphia, and St. Louis noted that the demand for nonfinancial services remained soft, although the pace of the decline was described as slowing in the latter two Districts. Loan demand was described as weak and many Districts reported that credit standards remained tight. Most Districts reported improvements in manufacturing production. For instance, Philadelphia, Richmond, Atlanta, Cleveland, and Chicago reported moderate increases in new orders. Labor market conditions remained weak across all Districts. However, staffing firms in Atlanta, Dallas, Richmond, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Boston, New York, and Chicago did report a slight pickup in the demand for temporary workers.

재고는 소비와 유사하게 관리되고 있다. 주택시장은 개선조짐이 나타나고 있다. 산업생산도 개선이 나타나고 있다.

Wage pressures remained minimal across all Districts. Consumer prices were described as being steady in most Districts, although Kansas City and San Francisco noted some downward pressure on retail prices.

임금 상승압박은 최소한으로 유지되고 있다. 소비자 물가도 안정적이다.


부분별 내용

Consumer Spending and Tourism

Consumer spending remained soft in most Districts. The majority of Districts reported that retail activity was flat. Boston, Philadelphia, and Kansas City noted improvement in sales, but attributed the increase primarily to back-to-school purchases. Philadelphia, Chicago, Cleveland, and San Francisco observed that shoppers remained focused on essentials and continued to refrain from purchasing discretionary and big-ticket items. Kansas City and San Francisco noted weak restaurant sales. Richmond, Philadelphia, Chicago, Atlanta, and Boston remarked that retailer inventories were being closely monitored and were keeping them in line with low sales levels.

The majority of Districts reported that the cash-for-clunkers program helped boost traffic and sales, although Cleveland and Kansas City also remarked that used car sales were adversely affected by the program. The sustainability of the higher recent pace of new vehicle sales was questioned by industry contacts in the Richmond, Atlanta, Minneapolis, and San Francisco Districts.

Tourism activity varied. Kansas City, Minneapolis, and Richmond observed solid visitor numbers at local vacation destinations, whereas Atlanta and New York noted sluggish activity and aggressive hotel discounting. San Francisco reported that activity in California and Nevada was weak, but visitors to Hawaii had increased.

Real Estate and Construction

Residential real estate markets remained weak, but signs of improvement continued to be noted. Chicago, Richmond, Boston, and San Francisco observed an uptick in sales over the last six weeks, while sales in the Philadelphia District were described as steady. St. Louis commented that residential home sales had not improved. Most Districts reported that sales remained below the levels of a year earlier. However, Atlanta, New York, Cleveland, and Minneapolis documented some year-over-year gains in select markets. Most Districts noted that demand remained stronger at the low-end of the housing market. Boston, Cleveland, Dallas, Kansas City, Richmond, and New York indicated that the first-time home buyer tax incentive was spurring sales. However, Philadelphia did note an upturn in sales at the high-end of the market. Reports on house prices generally indicated ongoing downward pressures, although Dallas and New York noted some increases. Construction remained at low levels overall, although Chicago and Dallas reported a small increase in activity.

Reports on commercial real estate markets indicated that demand for space remained weak and that construction continued to decline in all Districts. Atlanta, Philadelphia, Richmond, and San Francisco reported that vacancy rates increased, while rates held steady in the Boston and Kansas City Districts and were mixed in New York. Boston, Dallas, Kansas City, Philadelphia, and Richmond commented that the demand for space remained weak. Commercial rents declined according to Boston, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, and Richmond. Rent concessions were reported in the Richmond and San Francisco markets, and Richmond noted that some landlords had postponed property improvements in an effort to conserve cash. Construction remained at very low levels, with modest improvements noted in public construction in the Chicago, Cleveland, and Minneapolis Districts.

Nonfinancial Services

Reports on the demand for nonfinancial services were mixed. San Francisco, Philadelphia, and St. Louis noted that the demand for service sector business remained soft, although the pace of decline was described as having slowed in the latter two Districts. The demand for legal services remained relatively flat at low levels according to Dallas and Minneapolis. Kansas City and Richmond cited increasing demand for technology-related services. Healthcare services in Minneapolis also experienced an uptick in demand. Demand for transportation services were mixed, with some Districts noting stabilization at weak levels. Reports indicated that freight volume declines were moderating in Cleveland, while Dallas and Atlanta reported a modest pickup in rail shipments.

Banking and Financial Services

Most Districts reported that loan demand was weak and that credit standards remained tight. New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Kansas City, St. Louis, and San Francisco observed further weakening in loan demand across most categories. Dallas noted scattered reports of improvements in loan demand. Contacts in Cleveland, Chicago, and Dallas noted an increase in demand for auto loans. Credit standards ranged from unchanged to tighter in most Districts. However, Chicago reported that credit conditions and availability had improved.

Mortgage activity declined modestly according to the Philadelphia, Cleveland, and Kansas City Districts, while Richmond reported increases attributed to improved demand for starter homes. Dallas noted an uptick in refinancing activity. Commercial and industrial lending declined in the Philadelphia and Kansas City regions, and was steady according to Richmond. The lack of available credit was cited as an issue for both residential and commercial contractors in Cleveland, and for commercial real estate borrowers in Atlanta. San Francisco reported an increase in venture capital investment.

Further deterioration in credit quality was noted by Philadelphia, Richmond, Dallas, and San Francisco, whereas Cleveland observed some improvement in credit quality. Chicago also cited improvements in credit quality, apart from home equity and commercial real estate. Dallas and Chicago noted increases in consumer bankruptcies, while rising delinquency rates were reported by New York and Cleveland.

Manufacturing

Most Districts reported modest improvements in the manufacturing sector. Philadelphia, Richmond, Atlanta, Cleveland, and Chicago all reported slight-to-moderate increases in new orders. San Francisco indicated that new orders increased for manufacturers of semiconductors and other IT products, while orders declined for metal fabricators and petroleum refineries. Dallas noted that orders held steady, while St. Louis reported that manufacturing output continued to decline, but at a slower pace. Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, and Minneapolis reported increases or planned increases in automobile and automobile-related production. Several Districts also noted increased production in the pharmaceutical industry.

The near-term outlook among manufacturers varied, but the majority of reports indicated that manufacturers were cautiously optimistic. Boston, New York, and Philadelphia reported that their contacts expect modest growth later this year or early 2010. Boston noted that while its contacts generally expect modest growth, several cost control measures would remain in place. Dallas reported increased uncertainty among construction-related manufacturers, while Cleveland noted that half of their manufacturing contacts expected weak demand into 2010.

Employment, Wages, and Prices

Labor market conditions remained weak across all Districts, but several also noted an uptick in temporary hiring and a decline in the pace of layoffs. Richmond reported that most service-providing firms continued to cut employees, while Minneapolis and New York noted additional layoffs in the manufacturing sector. Cleveland reported modest job declines in the banking, commercial construction, and coal mining sectors. Further job cuts are expected in auto manufacturing according to St. Louis, and Dallas indicated further staff reductions are anticipated in the airline, energy, and residential construction sectors. Staffing firms in a majority of Districts reported a modest increase in the demand for temporary workers, although industry contacts in Boston also questioned whether these gains will persist. New York cited a modest pickup in temporary hiring for the legal and financial industries. Chicago noted an uptick in demand for workers in the healthcare and information technology industries. St. Louis and Minneapolis reported that federal stimulus funds have had a positive impact on construction and local government jobs.

Wage pressures remained low across all Districts. Several Districts noted businesses and local governments imposing wage freezes or even reducing employee compensation in some instances. Boston noted that several manufacturers who have cut wage rates do not expect to restore pay levels until next year. Kansas City, Philadelphia, Chicago, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Dallas, and Richmond noted an increase in the cost of some raw materials, including fuel, metals, and steel. Chicago and Dallas mentioned that excess supply was putting substantial downward pressure on natural gas prices. Retail prices were described as generally steady in most Districts, although Kansas City and San Francisco noted continued discounting and downward pressure on consumer prices.

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Reports on agricultural activity were mixed. Weather conditions were described as being favorable in St. Louis, Kansas City, and Atlanta. However, cold weather, crop diseases, and drought were limiting production of corn, cotton, and soybeans in the Chicago, Minneapolis, and Dallas Districts. Drought and weak market conditions were significantly affecting livestock industries according to Kansas City and Dallas. Dallas reported that some ranchers had liquidated portions of their cattle herds, while hog producers in the Kansas City District were said to be struggling as a result of lower pork prices.

Atlanta, Dallas, Kansas City, and San Francisco noted increased oil and gas inventories as a result of reduced consumption. Contacts in the natural gas industry noted that subdued demand continued to suppress prices and has lead to cutbacks in extraction activity. Cleveland indicated that weak demand for electricity prompted coal producers to scale back production and capital investment. Kansas City noted that although coal production in Wyoming had risen, it remained below year-ago levels. Dallas and Atlanta remarked that oil and gas drilling activity continued to decline in the Gulf of Mexico, whereas Kansas City and Dallas reported that the number of rigs operating on land had increased.

2009
January

14

HTML

183 KB PDF


February


March

4

HTML

187 KB PDF


April

15

HTML

253 KB PDF


May


June

10

HTML

232 KB PDF


July

29

HTML

276 KB PDF


August


September

9

HTML

166 KB PDF


October

21



November


December

2



2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996

1970 - present (on the web site of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis)

[관련글]
2009-07-29 미국 베이지북 7월호


맞춤검색

,

금호타이어 노조가 장기간 파업에 들어가, 결국 금호타이어 사측이 직장폐쇄 절차에 돌입했다고 합니다.
제반 정황을 보았을 때, 금호타이어 노조의 이번 파업은 설득력이 없습니다. 파업을 철회해야 합니다.

이유는 여러가지가 있습니다.


1. 글로벌 경기침체 + 2.0% 초저금리 + 물가안정
2007년 하반기부터 시작된 글로벌 경기침체에 따라, 산업을 막론하고 너도 나도 어려움을 겪어왔습니다.
전세계가 이러한 어려움에 처하자, 세계 각국은 함께 금리를 낮추고 초저금리를 유지했습니다.
더욱이, 물가도 상당기간 안정세가 지속되고 있습니다.

나만 어려운 것이 아니라, 다 어려운 상황에, 물가상승 압박도 덜하기 때문에, 임금 상승 압박 요인이 적은 것입니다.

임금을 올리는게 문제가 아니라, 임금을 동결하고, 오히려 임금을 축소하여, 해고자를 줄이고자 하는 노력이 각 사업장이나 기업마다 계속 이어져 왔습니다.
이런 흐름과 노력을 무시하면 안됩니다.

무엇보다, 피고용자, 노동자 입장이라고 하더라도, 남의 일처럼 생각해서는 안되고, 어느 정도의 고통분담은 해야 합니다.
자기 책임이 아니더라도 마찬가지입니다.

각 경제주체들이 세계 공통으로 노력하고 있는 마당에, 나 홀로 임금인상에 나서는 것은 필요하지도 않고 시의적절하지도 않습니다. 물가가 안정되어 있는 상황에서, 2.0%라는 초저금리가 유지되고 있는 마당에 더욱 그러합니다.

금호타이어 노조는 무려 7%대 후반에 이르는 임금인상을 요구했다고 합니다. 설득력이 있을까요?
제가 아는 주변 업종, 사업장만 하더라도 임금 동결과 임금 삭감이 태반입니다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 해고자가 늘어나는 것보다는 낫기 때문에, 다음 좋은 시절을 기약하고 참고 있는 겁니다.

다시 말씀드리듯이, 여기에는 통화정책당국의 노력과 물가 안정 상황도 고려되어야 합니다.
임금 인상 요인이 거의 없다는 것입니다.


2. 금호그룹 계열사 전반 체산성 떨어져
금호그룹 전계열사들의 경우, 다른 국내 굴지 그룹에 비해 사업의 체산성, 영업이익률이 떨어진다는 지적을 지속적으로 받아왔습니다. 지금도 다르지 않습니다.
경영의 효율성, 마진율이 떨어진다는 것입니다. 이는 경영 책임에서 비롯될 수도 있지만,
금호그룹 각 계열사 사업장에서 긴장감이 떨어져서 그럴 수도 있습니다. 나태하지 않은가 점검해야 하는 것입니다.

사업주도 그렇고, 노동자도 그렇고 함께 생각해야 합니다.

금호타이어도 마찬가지로 -2,000억을 넘는 영업적자가 보고되고 있습니다. 이게 과연 정상일까요?
뭔가 경영상의 큰 문제가 있는 것입니다. 회사를 구성하는 모든 당사자들이 함께 생각해 보아야 합니다.

즉흥적으로 지적하는 것이 아니라, 제가 금호그룹이나 금호타이어 재무제표를 쭉 지켜봐왔기 때문에 말씀드릴 수 있는 겁니다. 
이런 마당에 임금 올려달라고 하는게 설득력이 있을까요?


3. 혹여나 초과근로를 고려해도 고임금, 형평성 맞지 않아
금일 언론보도에 의하면, 금호타이어 생산직 노동자의 임금이 평균 7천만원을 넘어선다고 보고되고 있습니다.
2009년 반기보고서에 따르면 전직원의 반기 6개월간 평균임금은 2,880만원이었습니다. 연으로 환산하면 6천만원이 넘습니다.
이 정도면 전업종 생산직 최고 수준이라고 해도 과언이 아니라고 생각합니다. 혹여 초과근로 수당, 각종 수당 모두 포함해서 그렇다고 해도 고임금은 고임금입니다.

일하고 싶어도 일하지 못하고, 하루종일 풀로 일해도 그만큼 채우지 못하는 사람들이 태반인 마당에,
이런 시기에 7%를 넘어서는 임금인상을 들고 나오는 것이 정당할까요?


4. 금호타이어 실적 제대로 개선된 적 없어
회사가 잘 나가고, 영업실적이 좋으면 모르겠지만, 이미 2천억이 넘는 적자를 보고하고 있습니다.
이런 마당에 이해할 수 없는 임금인상안을 들고 나오는 것은 설득력이 없습니다.


5. 금호그룹 경영진 책임 있으나, 금호타이어 경영, 체산성 효율화가 우선
금호그룹은 현재 여러모로 위기를 겪고 있습니다. 이런 지경까지 온 데에는 물론 경영진의 책임이 가장 큽니다.
그렇다고, 같은 회사의 주인들인 노동자들이 나 몰라라 하는 것은 말이 안됩니다.
설령 누구의 잘못이었든지, 같이 고통을 극복하고 함께 이겨내려는 노력과 행동이 필요합니다.

지금 금호타이어의 파업은 전혀 설득력을 가질 수 없습니다.


6. 지역경제 왜 생각 안하나
특히 금호타이어가 해당 지역에서 중추적인 경제적 역할을 하고 있는 마당에, 자신들의 파업과 직장폐쇄가 지역경제에 얼마나 큰 폐해를 주게 될지를 생각해야 합니다.

여전히 세계경제나 개별 경제주체들이나 어려운 시기를 넘겨가고 있습니다.
이런 시기에는 조금 양보하는 마음으로 함께 위기를 극복해 가는 것이 중요합니다.

나만 힘든 것이 아니고, 모두가 고통 분담해 가는 마당에, 과도한 임금 인상을 들고나오는 것은 전혀 설득력이 없습니다.
또한, 임금인상이 반드시 필요한 환경도 아닙니다.

지역경제가 무너지면 나만 사는 것이 아니라, 다 죽는 겁니다.

물론, 사측도 2천억 이상의 적자를 낸 것은 사측의 책임이 가장 큽니다. 이런 적자폭은 임금비용으로 설명될 수 있는 것이 아닙니다. 사측도 노동자에게 화풀이 하듯이, 해고를 남발한다던가, 직장폐쇄를 단행한다던가, 막장으로 가서는 안될 것입니다.

서로 양보하고, 활로를 찾아내서 살아나가려는 노력이 중요합니다.
쌍용차 사태에서 교훈을 얻어야 합니다. 생산과 매출이 일어나지 않는 사업장은 어떤 해결책도 제시해 줄 수 없습니다.

금호타이어 노조는 올해는 물론 당분간 임금인상을 동결하고, 사측은 직장폐쇄 조치를 해제하기를 촉구합니다.


맞춤검색

,

미국 산업생산, Industrial Production 7월 지표가 월간 -0.4% 감소한 것으로 나타났습니다.
전월 수치는 -1.2%였고, 당월 예상치는 -0.6%였습니다.

이러한 산업생산 지표는 여전히 하락세이나 하락 추세가 둔화되고 있음을 나타내고, 예상치보다 다소 양호한 수치입니다.

산업생산 지표는 경기순환(Business Cycle)의 위치를 나타내는 대표적인 경기선행지표의 하나로,
고용이나 임금과 같은 소비자 지표와 많은 상관 관계를 지닙니다.



1960년대 후반부터 나타나고 있는 산업생산(Industrial Production) 지표를 보면, 최근에도 여전히 하락세가 지속되고 있습니다.
그러나 하락세는 둔화되고 있기 때문에, 속도는 더딜지라도 일정 시점에 방향이 미약하게나마 전환될 가능성은 열려 있다고 생각되네요.





소비재부분에서 내구재(Durable) 부분을 보면, 2009년 연중 다시 하강하고 있지만, 아랫 깊이가 깊기 때문에 하락세가 둔화되고 돌려세울 가능성은 있습니다.
장비재(Equipment)부분을 보면 '방위,항공,우주' 부분에서는 방향이 바뀐 모습입니다.



기타 부분에서도 하락세가 지속되었습니다. 다만 모든 부분에서 "바닥이 깊기 때문에" 깊은 바닥을 확인하고 하락 추세가 둔화되고 있다고 볼 수 있겠네요.


전년 동기 대비해서도 산업생산 지표의 변화율(%)이 깊기 때문에, 기술적 반등이 나타날 수 있습니다.

시기적으로, 기술적으로 2009년 하반기는 경기의 1차 반등의 시도가 "기술적"(technical)으로 일어날 것으로 보이는데, 관찰의 관점은, "일어난다는 것"이 아니라, 그 정도와 추세가 될 것으로 보입니다.
1차 기술적 반등이 시원치 않을 경우, 기대는 2010년 내년으로 다시 미뤄질 수도 있습니다.


이하, Federal Reserve가 발표한 2009년 7월 미국 산업생산(Industrial Production) 발표 내용입니다.

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Industrial production decreased 0.4 percent in June after having fallen 1.2 percent in May. For the second quarter as a whole, output fell at an annual rate of 11.6 percent, a more moderate contraction than in the first quarter, when output fell 19.1 percent. Manufacturing output moved down 0.6 percent in June, with declines at both durable and nondurable goods producers. Outside of manufacturing, the output of mines fell 0.5 percent in June, and the output of utilities increased 0.8 percent. The rate of capacity utilization for total industry declined in June to 68.0 percent, a level 12.9 percentage points below its average for 1972-2008. Prior to the current recession, the low over the history of this series, which begins in 1967, was 70.9 percent in December 1982.

(출처 : Ferderal Reserve Statistical)


[관련글]
미국 엠파이어 스테이트 제조업 지수 _2009.07.15
미국 산업생산 6월 지표 _2009.06.16


맞춤검색

,

비정규직법안에 대해 말이 많은데요.  비정규직이 왜 생겨나게 되었는지 아는게 우선 순서가 아닐까요?

비정규직일 수록 더욱 더 비정규직이 왜 생겨나게 되었는지 알아야 합니다.

비정규직이 애초에 있었다거나, 당연하다고 까지 여기는 분들도 있는데, 아니라는 것이죠.
'비정규직'은 원래 있었던 것이거나, '자연스러운' 것이 아닙니다. 인위적으로 강요된 것입니다. 

이런 왜곡된 비정규직의 역사가 긴 것도 아닙니다. 


그러면, 비정규직이 왜 생겨났을까요? 


여기서 또 '한나라당'이 나오는 겁니다. 참 질긴 굴곡의 역사지요? 어딜가나 빠지지 않습니다.
참 대단하~죠~잉?  뻔뻔하다는 것입니다.

비정규직의 시초가 된 것은, 1996년 12월 26일에 크리스마스 새벽에 신한국당 (한나라당 전신, 여당)이
자기들끼리 몰래 모여서 근로기준법, 노동조합법, 노동쟁의조정법을 날치기 통과시킨 것으로부터 시작됩니다. 

왜 비정규직법의 책임을 2년전 입법 과정에서 찾는지 저는 참 모르겠네요. 이 법은 비정규직을 없애기 위한 입법취지를 담고 있지요. 다른 말로 하면, 사람 쓸려면 다 정규직으로 쓰라는 얘기입니다.


김영삼정권이 날치기로 노동법 개악을 단행하고, 파견근로제변형근로제를 도입, 허용하면서,
이제 500만명이 넘어선다는 "비정규직"의 비극이 시작된 것입니다. 

여러분...   비정규직은 "당위"(should)가 아니에요. 


까놓고 얘기하면, 사회적으로 폐습자들에 의해 일시적으로 형성된 나쁜 사회적 "악행"입니다.
그 자체가 반정의적입니다. 따라서 깨야 합니다.

비정규직은 원래 있던 게 아닙니다.
설령 그것이 동일한 임금일지라도, 이제 정규직으로 전환하면 됩니다.

 
아래 글은, 그 시절의 경과에 대해 잘 정리된 글이어서 소개시켜 봅니다.
출처는 위, 아래로 밝혀져 있습니다.

날치기 현장


---------------------------
비정규직의 기원 - 1996년 신한국당 노동법 날치기 통과, 파견근로제, 변형근로제 도입

출처 : http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=68919

96년도 말
에 한나라당의 전신인 신한국당(한나라당,여당) 국회의원님들이 근로기준법, 노동조합법, 노동쟁의조정법을 개악하는 법률을 통과 시켰습니다.
그때 민주당 전신인 새정치국민회의(맞나? 아무튼 민주당, 야당) 국회의원님들이 거의 1대 1로 여당 국회의원을 감시하면서 법률 통과를 막고 있었는데, 여당 의원들이 새벽에 몰래 서울의 어떤 곳에 모여서 버스를 타고 국회에 들어가서 날치기로 통과 시켰습니다. 그때 같이 통과 시키려던 것이 공공의 안정(일명 공안)과 관련된 법안도 같이 통과 시켰습니다. 다시봐도 훌륭하신 분들입니다.

노동법과 관련되어서는 몇가지 핵심적인 부분이 있었는데 노동자들이 전국적인 총파업을 3차례 벌여내고 정부와 직접 교섭을 해서 97년 3월에 다시 법안을 개정하여 통과 시켰습니다.
핵심적인 부분은

3자 개입금지 - 노사관계에 3자가 개입할 수 없다는 내용인데 신고만 하면 가능하도록 되었습니다.
정치활동금지 - 노조는 정치활동을 못하도록 되어 있었는데 선거법까지 바꿔가며 정치활동이 가능해졌습니다.
초기업별노조 인정 - 산업별로 단일노동조합을 만들 수 있도록 하는 제도인데 노동계의 숙원사업이었고 이 여파로 현재 산업별 노동조합이 많이 만들어 지고 있습니다.(이 부분은 제가 잘 모르는 부분인데 법령자체가 바뀐 것 같지는 않고 시행령이나 규칙을 바꿔서 가능해 진 것도 같습니다.)

근로자 파견제도 인정 -
사람장사를 하는 아주 나쁜 제도인데 이부분은 김영삼 정부가 이겨서 98년도에 법률이 만들어지고 그 여파로 지금 비정규직이 사회문제화 되어버렸습니다.
정리해고제 도입
- 예전에는 구조조정이니 정리해고니 없었는데 이 때 뿅하고 나타나서 지금까지 여러사람 짤렸습니다.
변형근로시간제 - 탄력적, 선택적 근로시간제인데 이 제도는 지금 오리무중입니다. 여태껏 이런 제도로 얼마나 많은 사람이 피해를 보고 있는지, 어떻게 운영되고 있는지 조사나 논문이 거의 없습니다. 내용만 보면 무지하게 임금이 많이 깍이는 제도라고 알면 되겠습니다.

출처 : http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=68919
-------

1996년, 1997년에 걸쳐 이런 왜곡된 근로조건과 고용조건을 도입하는 것은 안된다고 지식인들과 노동계에서 무지하게 노력하고 항의했습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 신한국당(현 한나라당)은 이러한 비정규직 도입을 적극적으로 추진했습니다. 역사적인 희대의 날치기까지 동원하면서 말이죠.

그리고 그 결과가 무엇입니까? 무려 500만을 넘어선다는 비정규직의 탄생입니다.
그 전에 IMF도 불러왔죠?  그래서 경제가 좋아졌습니까, 기업이 살아났습니까?

아니... 양심들 좀 있으면, 어서 문닫고 집에나 가세요. 한심해요.


맞춤검색

,

(★ 검색으로 결과를 얻어보세요. Let's Search ★)



--> I'm Lucky 최근글 <--