--> I'm Lucky 최근글 <--

'미국경제'에 해당되는 글 43건




  1. 2009.04.23 미국 HPI, Home Price Index 주택가격 지수, 월간 0.7% 상승 _09.04.22
  2. 2009.04.22 미국 경기선행지수 3월 -0.3% 감소 _컨퍼런스보드 _09.04.20
  3. 2009.04.18 미국 경제지표 주간 발표 일정 _09.04.20~04.24
  4. 2009.04.18 미국 실업률 지도 _ 실업률 8.5%, 일부지역 25% 상회 _1948~2009.04 _US Unemployment rate
  5. 2009.04.18 미국 산업생산, Industrial Production 4월 월간 -1.5% _09.04.15
  6. 2009.04.18 미국 4월 Empire State Manufacturing Index, 엠파이어 스테이트 제조업 지수 -14.7 _09.04.15
  7. 2009.04.17 미국 베이지북 2009년 4월호 주요내용 _US Beige Book _2009.04.15
  8. 2009.04.15 미국, Retail Sales, 소매판매 월간 -1.1% 재감소 _09.04.14
 

미국 HPI, Home Price Index, 주택가격지수가 2009년 1월~2009년 2월 사이에 0.7% 상승한 것으로 발표되었습니다.
(US Federal Housing Finanace Agency 발표 _현지 09.04.22)




전체 HPI의 지수 흐름을 보면 2007년 초반을 고점권으로 하강세를 이어가고 있으며, 2008년 12월~2009년 2월간 소폭의 반등세를 보이고는 있으나, 직전의 주택가격 지수 상승세가 과도하게 가파르다고 볼 수 있기 때문에, 일시적인 기술적 반등을 넘어서서 본격적인 안정세로 접어들 수 있을지는 아직 의문입니다.




지역별로 보면, 하락세가 가파랐던 Pacific 서부 태평양 연안 지역에서 월간 반등세가 가팔랐고, 서중부지역에서 1~2% 정도의 반등세가 나타나고는 있으나, 직전 수개월 상승세를 보였던 동중부지역이나 남부아틀란틱 지역에서 재차 하락세가 나타나고 있고, 전반적으로 기술적 반등세를 넘어설만큼 회복세가 뚜렷하다고 보기는 이르다고 보입니다.




월간 가격이 상승한 것으로 나타난 지역의 경우에도, 2007~2008년 2월간, 2008년~2009년 2월간 가격변화 지표를 보면, 
West South Central 지역과 같은 경우에는 2007, 2008년 연중으로도 가격이 상승하여 따로 놀고 있어서 비중이나 통계적 의미가 다소 떨어지지 않는가 생각되며, Est South Center, Middle Atlantic 지역처럼 2007년 연중으로 소폭 상승한 지역도 있지만, 2008년 연중 하락세에 가세하였고, 
최근 가장 큰 폭이 하락세를 보여주고 있는 서부 Pacfic 태평양 지역을 보면, 2008년 하락세 -19.1%로, 2009년 1월~2009년 2월 월간 3.8%의 최초의 개선세는 이러한 급격한 침체에 따른 기술적 반등으로 볼 수 있어, 아직 회복세로 보기에는 역시 이르다고 
생각되며, 
HPI 지수에 대한 시간적으로 여유를 가지는 추가 관찰이 계속 요구된다고 보입니다. 

다음은 Federal Housing Finanace Agency의 발표 요지입니다.



 
U.S. MONTHLY HOUSE PRICE INDEX ESTIMATES 0.7
PERCENT PRICE INCREASE FROM JANUARY TO
FEBRUARY
WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. home prices rose 0.7 percent on a seasonally-adjusted basis
from January to February, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s monthly
House Price Index. January’s previously reported 1.7 percent increase was revised to a 1.0
percent increase. For the 12 months ending in February, U.S. prices fell 6.5 percent. The
U.S. index is 9.5 percent below its April 2007 peak.
The FHFA monthly index is calculated using purchase prices of houses backing mortgages
that have been sold to or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. For the nine Census
Divisions, seasonally-adjusted monthly price changes from January to February ranged
from –1.2 percent in the East North Central Division to +3.8 percent in the Pacific
Division.
Monthly index values and appreciation rate estimates are provided in the table and graphs
on the following pages. As with FHFA’s quarterly HPI, the estimates will be revised as new
data become available. Quarterly HPI reports include updated monthly data presented in
the same format as the attached table.
For detailed information concerning the monthly HPI, please see the HPI Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQ). The next release of index data will be on May 27, 2009 and will
include data for the first quarter of 2009 as well as the month of March.

출처 :  Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)



맞춤검색

,


미국 경기선행지수가 2009년 3월 -0.3% 감소했다고 컨퍼런스보드가 2009년 4월 20일 현지 발표하였습니다.
둔화세가 지속되고 있고, 본격적인 회복세는 아직 이르다고 볼 수 있습니다.

LEI = 컨퍼런스보드 경기선행지수 (미국)
CEI = 컨퍼런스보드 경기신뢰지수 (미국)





Released: Monday, April 20, 2009

The Conference Board Leading Economic Index™ (LEI) for the U.S. decreased 0.3 percent, The Conference Board Coincident Economic Index™ (CEI) decreased 0.4 percent and The Conference Board Lagging Economic Index™ (LAG) decreased 0.4 percent in March.


  • The Conference Board LEI for the U.S. declined again in March, and the index has not risen in the past nine months. Building permits, stock prices, and the index of supplier deliveries made large negative contributions to the index this month, more than offsetting continued positive contributions from real money supply and the yield spread. In the six months through March, the index fell 2.5 percent (about a -4.9 percent annual rate), faster than the decrease of 1.4 percent (a -2.7 percent annual rate) for the previous six months. In addition, the weaknesses among the leading indicators have remained widespread in recent months.
  •  

  • The Conference Board CEI for the U.S. continued falling in March, driven by further declines in employment and industrial production. In the six months through March, the index decreased 3.0 percent (about a -5.8 percent annual rate), faster than the decline of 2.0 percent (a -3.9 percent annual rate) for the previous six months. In March, the lagging economic index for the U.S. fell by the same amount as the coincident economic index, and as a result, the coincident to lagging ratio remained unchanged. Meanwhile, real GDP contracted at an average annual rate of 3.5 percent in the second half of 2008 (including a decline of 6.3 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter).
  •  

  • The Conference Board LEI for the U.S. remains on a general downtrend that began in July 2007, with widespread weaknesses among its components. However, its rate of decline has moderated somewhat this year. The Conference Board CEI for the U.S. has been on a declining trend since November 2007, although it has also decreased at a modestly slower pace in recent months. All in all, the behavior of the composite economic indexes suggests that the economic recession that started in December 2007 will continue in the near term, but that the contraction in activity could become less severe in upcoming months.

  • 출처 : US Conference Board


    맞춤검색

    ,
     
    미국 경제지표 지표 주간발표(09.04.20~09.04.24) 일정입니다.
    다음주에는 실업청구건수를 비롯하여, 주택판매 지표가 발표됩니다.
    특히, 내구재주문의 경우 일시적 회복세 이후 재악화도 예상되고 있으므로 경계가 필요해 보입니다.
    다음주 후반에는 FRB의 은행권에 대한 Bank Stress Test 결과 발표가 있다고 합니다.
    모두 통과될 것으로 보여 고무적이라고 하나, 경기 회복세가 아직 본질적으로 일어나고 있다고 보기는 힘들기 때문에,
    지수 전반에 대해서도 과도한 추격은 자제하고 차후 진입 시점을 모색하는 것이 좋다고 생각됩니다.

     
    Apr 19 - Apr 25
    Date   Actual Forecast Previous
    Mon FOMC Member Evans Speaks      
    20-Apr CB Leading Index m/m   -0.20% -0.40%
      FOMC Member Evans Speaks      
      FOMC Member Kohn Speaks      
    Tue  
    21-Apr
    Wed HPI m/m   -0.70% 1.70%
    22-Apr Crude Oil Inventories     5.6M
    Thu Unemployment Claims   635K 610K
    23-Apr Existing Home Sales   4.66M 4.72M
      Natural Gas Storage     21B
    Fri Treasury Sec Geithner Speaks      
    24-Apr Core Durable Goods Orders m/m   -1.10%
    3.70%
     
      Durable Goods Orders m/m   -1.40%
    3.50%
     
      New Home Sales   340K 337K
      Bank Stress Test      



    맞춤검색

    ,


    다음은 미국실업률 추이 및 미국 실업률 지역별 지도 입니다. _1949~2009.04

    실업률은 계속 상승하고 있으며, OECD는 금년~내년까지 미국 실업률이 평균 10%를 상회할 것으로 최근에 전망한 바 있습니다.

    미국의 지역별 실업률을 보면, 2009년 3월 현재 미국 전역 평균 8.5%에 이르는 가운데,
    서부 및 동부 내륙 공업지역이 심각한 상태를 보여주고 있으며, 이들 일부 지역의 실업률은 이미 20%를 상회하고 있으며,
    실업률이 25%를 이미 넘어서고 있는 지역도 나타나고 있습니다.


    미국 실업률 변화 _1999~2009.03

     
    Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey


    Series Id:           lns14000000
    Seasonal Adjusted
    Series title:        (Seas) Unemployment Rate
    Labor force status:  Unemployment rate
    Type of data:        Percent
    Age:                 16 years and over
    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
    1999 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0  
    2000 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9  
    2001 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7  
    2002 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0  
    2003 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7  
    2004 5.7 5.6 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4  
    2005 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8  
    2006 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4  
    2007 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.9  
    2008 4.9 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.5 5.6 5.8 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.8 7.2  
    2009 7.6 8.1 8.5                    

    출처 : US Bureau of Labor Statistics


    미국 실업률 변화 _1948~2009.03

    Series Id:           LNS14000000
    Seasonal Adjusted
    Series title:        (Seas) Unemployment Rate
    Labor force status:  Unemployment rate
    Type of data:        Percent
    Age:                 16 years and over

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
    1948 3.4 3.8 4.0 3.9 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.8 4.0  
    1949 4.3 4.7 5.0 5.3 6.1 6.2 6.7 6.8 6.6 7.9 6.4 6.6  
    1950 6.5 6.4 6.3 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.0 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.3  
    1951 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.1  
    1952 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.7  
    1953 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.5 4.5  
    1954 4.9 5.2 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0  
    1955 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.2  
    1956 4.0 3.9 4.2 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.3 4.2  
    1957 4.2 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2  
    1958 5.8 6.4 6.7 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.5 7.4 7.1 6.7 6.2 6.2  
    1959 6.0 5.9 5.6 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.5 5.7 5.8 5.3  
    1960 5.2 4.8 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.5 6.1 6.1 6.6  
    1961 6.6 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.1 6.9 7.0 6.6 6.7 6.5 6.1 6.0  
    1962 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.7 5.5  
    1963 5.7 5.9 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.5  
    1964 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.1 5.2 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.1 4.8 5.0  
    1965 4.9 5.1 4.7 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0  
    1966 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8  
    1967 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.9 3.8  
    1968 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4  
    1969 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5  
    1970 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.4 5.5 5.9 6.1  
    1971 5.9 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.0 5.8 6.0 6.0  
    1972 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.3 5.2  
    1973 4.9 5.0 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.9  
    1974 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.9 6.0 6.6 7.2  
    1975 8.1 8.1 8.6 8.8 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.3 8.2  
    1976 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.8  
    1977 7.5 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 7.2 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.4  
    1978 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.1 6.0 5.9 6.2 5.9 6.0 5.8 5.9 6.0  
    1979 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.7 6.0 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.0  
    1980 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.9 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.2  
    1981 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.9 8.3 8.5  
    1982 8.6 8.9 9.0 9.3 9.4 9.6 9.8 9.8 10.1 10.4 10.8 10.8  
    1983 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.2 10.1 10.1 9.4 9.5 9.2 8.8 8.5 8.3  
    1984 8.0 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.2 7.3  
    1985 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.4 7.4 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.0 7.0  
    1986 6.7 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.0 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.9 6.6  
    1987 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.0 5.9 6.0 5.8 5.7  
    1988 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.4 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.3  
    1989 5.4 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4  
    1990 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.2 5.5 5.7 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.3  
    1991 6.4 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.3  
    1992 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.3 7.4 7.4  
    1993 7.3 7.1 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.5  
    1994 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.5  
    1995 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.6  
    1996 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4  
    1997 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.1 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.7  
    1998 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4  
    1999 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0  
    2000 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9  
    2001 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7  
    2002 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0  
    2003 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7  
    2004 5.7 5.6 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4  
    2005 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8  
    2006 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4  
    2007 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.9  
    2008 4.9 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.5 5.6 5.8 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.8 7.2  
    2009 7.6 8.1 8.5                    

    출처 : US Bureau of Labor Statistics


    미국 지역별 실업률 지도

    출처 : New York Times


    맞춤검색

    ,

     
    미국 산업생산, Industrial Production 지표가 4월 월간(m/m) -1.5% 추가 하락하였습니다.

    산업생산, Industrial Production 지표로 보면 침체한 미국경기는 아직 뚜렷한 회복세로 전환되지는 못하고 있음을
    볼 수 있습니다.



    Industrial production fell 1.5 percent in March after a similar decrease in February. For the first quarter as a whole, output dropped at an annual rate of 20.0 percent, the largest quarterly decrease of the current contraction. At 97.4 percent of its 2002 average, output in March fell to its lowest level since December 1998 and was nearly 13 percent below its year-earlier level. Production in manufacturing moved down 1.7 percent in March and has registered five consecutive quarterly decreases. Broad-based declines in production continued; one exception was the output of motor vehicles and parts, which advanced slightly in March but remained well below its year-earlier level. Outside of manufacturing, the output of mines fell 3.2 percent in March, as oil and gas well drilling continued to drop. After a relatively mild February, a return to more seasonal temperatures pushed up the output of utilities. The capacity utilization rate for total industry fell further to 69.3 percent, a historical low for this series, which begins in 1967. (Federal Reserve 보고 자료)







    산업생산성, Production 지표를 보면, 1970년대 석유파동과, 1970년대 후반, 1980년대 초반의 경제침체기 이후로
    가장 심각하고 급격한 침체의 모습을 보여주고 있음을 알 수 있습니다.




    산업별로 보면, 소비재, Consumer Goods에서 내구재, Durable 부문이 급격히 침체했고,
    장비, Equipment부분은 민간재 부분의 침체가 심화되었으며,
    건설, Construction과 비에너지, Non-energy 부분이 급격하게 침강하였습니다.



    또한 산업별로 보면, 하이테크놀로지 산업 부분을 제외한 부분이 더 타격받고 있다고 추정할 수 있으므로,
    상대적으로 High-Tech 부분이 살아남는다면 개선세의 혜택도 먼저 나타날 것으로 일단 짐작은 가능합니다.

    자세한 자료는 첨부파일을 참조하시기 바랍니다.


    출처 : Federal Reserve



    맞춤검색

    ,

    미국 엠파이어 스테이트 제조업 지수, Empire State Manufacturing Index가 -14.7 로 여전히 마이너스권에 있지만,
    기존에 비하면 추세가 약간 올라서고 있어서, 둔화세가 완화되는 모습은 나타나고 있습니다. 2009년 4월 15일 현지 발표 

    Empire State Manufacturing Index는 New Tork State에 있는 약 200여개의 제조업체를 조사해서 현재의 일반적 비지니스 환경에 대한 반응을 수치화한한 지표입니다. 소비, 고용, 투자와 같은 경제활동과 경기체감도, 경제활력의 대표적 선행 지표로 일컬어 집니다. 다른 명칭으로는
    New York Manufacturing Index 로 불리기도 합니다.


    April 2009 Report

    Survey Indicators
    Seasonally Adjusted


     


    The Empire State Manufacturing Survey indicates that conditions for New York manufacturers continued to deteriorate in April, but at a much slower pace than in recent months. The general business conditions index climbed 24 points from its March record low, to -14.7. The new orders index shot up 41 points to a reading just below zero, and the shipments index rose 25 points, also reaching a level near zero. The inventories index continued to fall, hitting a record low -36.0.  The indexes for both prices paid and prices received remained negative. The index for number of employees, while negative, improved in April, but the average workweek index fell. Future indexes were much improved, with the future general business conditions, new orders, and shipments indexes rising sharply to levels not seen since September of last year. The capital spending and technology spending indexes remained below zero, although they were considerably above last month’s levels.

    In response to a series of supplementary questions, manufacturers generally indicated that factors other than tight credit were largely responsible for weakness in sales (see Supplemental Report tab).  A majority of those surveyed reported that their sales had fallen more than 10 percent below their levels in “normal” times.  The weak economy and uncertainty about the business outlook were widely cited as factors dampening demand for respondents’ products and services.  Most respondents cited little or no difficulty obtaining financing for either long-term commitments (capital investment) or short-term needs (operating expenses).  Moreover, fewer than 10 percent of those surveyed indicated that problems obtaining credit had adversely affected their production or sales.   

    General Business Conditions Index Rises Sharply
    The general business conditions index rebounded from the record low set in March, surging 24 points to -14.7. The fraction of respondents that reported improved conditions rose from 10 percent last month to 24 percent in April, and the percentage that reported worsening conditions fell from 48 percent to 39 percent. Although still negative, the new orders index shot up 41 points to -3.9, with 29 percent of respondents reporting an increase in orders. The shipments index also rose dramatically, climbing from -26.7 to -1.8. The unfilled orders index rose less sharply, advancing 6 points to -18.0. The delivery time index rose several points to -5.6. The inventories index fell for a second consecutive month, dropping 9 points to a record-low -36.0.

    Price and Employment Indexes Are Little Changed
    The prices paid index, at -14.6, was unchanged from March, remaining below zero for a fifth consecutive month. The prices received index rose 6 points to -18.0. The number of employees index remained well below zero but improved to -28.1. The average workweek index fell 5 points to -28.1.

    Six-Month Outlook Improves Markedly
    Future indexes suggested a significant improvement in the six-month outlook compared with readings in the last few months. The future general business conditions index rose 30 points, to 33.1, its highest level since September of last year. Fifty-one percent of respondents—compared with 38 percent in March—expected conditions to be better six months from now. The future new orders and shipments indexes rose to similarly high levels, and the future unfilled orders index turned positive for the first time this year. The future prices paid index remained just above zero, while the future prices received index was just below zero. The future number of employees index climbed 16 points to -4.6, and the future average workweek index rose above zero. The capital spending index advanced 18 points to -1.1, and the technology spending index rose 19 points to -4.5.

    출처 : Federal Reserve Bank of New York



    맞춤검색

    ,
     

    다음은 2009년 4월자 미국 베이지북(Beige Book) 주요내용입니다. 2009년 4월 15일 발표 (현지)

    Summary


    Prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas based on information collected on or before April 6, 2009. This document summarizes comments received from business and other contacts outside the Federal Reserve and is not a commentary on the views of Federal Reserve officials.


    April 15, 2009

    Reports from the Federal Reserve Banks indicate that overall economic activity contracted further or remained weak. However, five of the twelve Districts noted a moderation in the pace of decline, and several saw signs that activity in some sectors was stabilizing at a low level.

    전반적인 경제 활동은 침체를 지속하고 여전히 약세이지만, 12개 지역 중 5개 지역은 침체 속도가 완화하고 있고 미약하지만 몇몇 산업 섹터 활동은 약한 정도로 완화되는 징후가 나타나고 있습니다. 

    (*주: 베이지북의 주요 관찰 지역은, Districts 는 Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St.Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, San Francisco 입니다.)

    Boston
    New York
    Philadelphia
    Cleveland
    Richmond
    Atlanta
    Chicago
    St. Louis
    Minneapolis
    Kansas City
    Dallas
    San Francisco

    Manufacturing activity weakened across a broad range of industries in most Districts, with only a few exceptions. Nonfinancial service activity continued to contract across Districts. Retail spending remained sluggish, although some Districts noted a slight improvement in sales compared with the previous reporting period. Residential real estate markets continued to be weak. Home prices and construction were still falling in most areas, but better-than-expected buyer traffic led to a scattered pickup in sales in a number of Districts. Nonresidential real estate conditions continued to deteriorate. Difficulty obtaining commercial real estate financing was constraining construction and investment activity. Spending on business travel declined as corporations cut back. Reports on tourism were mixed. Bankers reported tight credit conditions, rising delinquencies, and some deterioration of loan quality.

    Agricultural conditions were generally favorable across Districts, although drought conditions persisted in the Dallas and San Francisco Districts. The Districts reporting on energy said reduced demand, high inventories, and lower prices led to steep cutbacks in oil and natural gas drilling and production activity. The Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Dallas Districts noted declines in employment in the oil and gas extraction industry.

    Downward pressure on prices was reported across Districts. Wage and salary pressures eased as labor markets weakened in all Districts, and many contacts continued to report job cuts and wage and hiring freezes. Employment continued to decline across a range of industries, with only scattered reports of hiring.

    Manufacturing
    Manufacturing activity continued to decline in most Districts and across a wide range of industries. Several reports, however, noted that the pace of decline had slowed or that factory activity had stabilized. The Boston, Philadelphia, Richmond, Atlanta, St. Louis, Minneapolis, and San Francisco Districts cited decreases in production. The Chicago and Kansas City Districts said declines in production had slowed. The Cleveland District noted some leveling off in declines in new orders, and the New York and Dallas Districts noted that demand was beginning to bottom out following steep declines. Orders and shipments of capital goods, autos, paper, and construction-related equipment and products such as metals, wood products, lumber and electrical machinery remained mostly sluggish and below year-ago levels, with the Chicago District noting an increase in order cancellations and deferral requests. Aircraft makers in the Chicago District noted declines in demand, while aerospace manufacturers in the San Francisco District reported that a drop in airline passenger traffic and cargo capacity had spurred order cancellations and delivery deferrals.

    In contrast, orders and sales of high-tech equipment firmed somewhat at very weak levels in the Dallas and San Francisco Districts. Defense firms in the Boston and Cleveland Districts reported solid activity. Food manufacturers saw sales gains in the Philadelphia and San Francisco Districts, and a food manufacturer in the St. Louis District noted plans to open a new plant. Pharmaceutical firms in the Boston and Chicago Districts continued to see solid demand; petrochemical producers in the Dallas District noted a slight turnaround in operating rates.

    Manufacturers' assessments of future factory activity improved marginally over the survey period as well, with contacts in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Kansas City Districts noting a slight upturn in the outlook for production and sales. Capital expenditure plans remained on hold across most regions, and the Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland Districts noted cuts in capital budgets.

    Nonfinancial Services
    Districts that report on nonfinancial business services said demand continued to fall across most industries. Providers of health-care services noted further declines in activity, and contacts in several Districts noted demand for professional services, such as architecture, business consulting and legal services, remained weak. Demand for IT services was mixed. Among service firms, there were reports of customers delaying payments or asking for price reductions, and receivables were harder to collect.

    While there were scattered reports of optimism, temporary staffing firms generally continued to report weak conditions. Firms in the Dallas District were not renewing contracts on current personnel, and the New York District characterized the supply of available workers as "inexhaustible."

    Shipping activity continued to fall over the past six weeks as both domestic and international demand remained dampened. Contacts in several Districts said shipments of construction-related manufacturing products continued to drop at a substantial pace.

    Consumer Spending and Tourism
    Consumer spending remained generally weak. However, several Districts said sales rose slightly or declines moderated compared with the previous survey period. In particular, the Boston, Cleveland, and Chicago Districts reported an improvement in sales. Purchases of big ticket and luxury items continued to decline while spending on food and necessities fared better. The Philadelphia, Dallas, and San Francisco Districts reported that consumers were looking for value, and were opting for lower-priced, private label products over higher-priced alternatives. Retailers kept inventories lean, in line with the slow pace of sales, and most expect demand to stay at current low levels over the next few months.

    Auto dealers continued to struggle, and overall vehicle sales were sluggish in all reporting Districts as weak demand and tight credit continued to limit sales. Used vehicle sales improved slightly in the Boston, Cleveland, Kansas City, and San Francisco Districts, but new car sales remained feeble. Dealers in the Philadelphia District reported difficulty in obtaining financing for inventory purchases, and a few dealerships in the St. Louis District went out of business, but dealers in the Cleveland District reported minimal problems with floor-plan financing. While auto dealers in the Boston, Cleveland, and Kansas City Districts noted some improvements in the outlook, those in the Philadelphia and Dallas Districts expect continued weakness.

    Travel and tourism activity contracted further in several reporting Districts, as households and businesses continued to scale back on discretionary and travel spending. Tourist spending in the New York, Minneapolis, and San Francisco Districts saw double-digit declines compared with the prior year. Airlines in the Dallas District and hotel contacts in the Kansas City District reported weakening demand for business travel, while the Atlanta District noted convention cancellations. Restaurants continued to see sluggish activity in the Kansas City and San Francisco Districts, which prompted further layoffs and closures in the latter region. In contrast, mountain resorts in the Richmond District said ski season demand was on par with last year, and cruise liners in the Atlanta District reported that deep discounting spurred bookings.

    Real Estate and Construction
    Housing markets remained depressed overall, but there were some signs that conditions may be stabilizing. Many Districts said factors such as homebuyer tax credits, low mortgage rates, and more affordable prices led to a rising number of potential buyers. The Richmond, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and San Francisco Districts noted a modest improvement in sales in some areas.

    New home construction activity fell further, however, as inventories remained elevated. Nonetheless, several Districts, including Atlanta and Kansas City, said that inventories of unsold homes had turned down slightly.

    Home prices continued to decline in most Districts, although a few reports noted that prices were unchanged or that the pace of decline had eased. Low mortgage rates were fueling refinancing activity. Outlooks for the housing sector were generally more optimistic than in earlier surveys, with respondents hopeful that increased buyer interest would lead to better sales.

    Nonresidential real estate conditions continued to deteriorate over the past six weeks. Demand for office, industrial and retail space continued to fall, and there were reports of increases in sublease space. Rental concessions were rising. Property values moved lower as reality "set in." Construction activity continues to slow, and several Districts noted increased postponement of both private and public projects. Nonresidential construction is expected to decline through year-end, although there were some hopeful reports that the stimulus package may lead to some improvement.

    Commercial real estate investment activity weakened further. Contacts said a decline in credit availability and markdowns on commercial property were keeping buyers and sellers on the sidelines.

    Banking and Finance
    Most Districts reported weaker loan demand overall, but the reports were mixed across loan categories. In particular, the New York, Richmond, and Kansas City Districts noted an increase in residential real estate loans. Additionally, residential refinancing activity remained brisk, although the loan process was taking longer due to more stringent appraisals and underwriting standards. Demand for commercial and industrial loans was weak, and there were several reports that business borrowers were postponing capital expenditures. Commercial real estate lending continued to decline. Credit availability generally remained very tight across regions. A number of Districts reported deteriorating loan quality and rising delinquencies for all types of loan categories. In particular, several reports noted more stringent requirements for commercial real estate loans due to worries of worsening loan quality in the sector.

    Agriculture and Natural Resources
    Most regions reported improved planting and growing conditions, with the exception of the Dallas and San Francisco Districts, which are experiencing ongoing drought. Although beneficial, rainfall delayed field preparations for spring planting in the Richmond and Chicago Districts. Contacts in the Chicago District reported that producers had benefited from falling input prices, which are helping farmers obtain loans. Livestock producers in the Chicago, Kansas City, and Dallas Districts continued to be challenged by weak demand and low prices. Low milk prices have resulted in significant financial losses for dairy farmers in the Chicago and Dallas Districts, and have caused producers in the latter region to reduce their dairy cow herds.

    Reduced demand, rising inventories, and lower prices for oil and natural gas led to further declines in energy sector activity. Drilling activity fell sharply in the Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Dallas Districts; respondents in the Atlanta and San Francisco Districts reported decreases as well. The Dallas District noted that the number of working U.S. rigs contracted by 300, and more than half of the decline was in Texas. In contrast, production was stable in the Cleveland District; gold mining is strong and wind energy projects moved ahead as planned in the Minneapolis District. Consistent with falling activity, the Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Dallas Districts noted further layoffs in oil and gas extraction. Looking forward, energy contacts in the Cleveland District said that they intend to lower capital spending over the next few months.

    Prices
    Districts that report on prices noted downward pressures. Oil prices rose during the survey period, although most other commodity prices were stable to down. Manufacturers noted declines in the cost of raw materials and inputs, and product prices were generally said to be steady to down. Significant discounting was reported among retailers, and there were numerous examples of service providers reducing fees. In particular, accounting and legal firms in the Dallas District were responding to customer requests for lower fees, while the San Francisco District found prices were declining for professional services and lodging. Transportation service contacts noted a reduction in prices.

    Labor Markets and Wages
    Labor market conditions were weak and reports of layoffs, reductions in work hours, temporary factory shutdowns, branch closures and hiring freezes remained widespread across Districts. Staffing firms in the New York, Cleveland, Richmond, Chicago, and Dallas Districts reported that demand for workers remained sluggish. The manufacturing and energy extraction sectors were the most affected but there were numerous reports of job cuts in the retail and services industries as well. The St. Louis District reported payroll declines in information and medical services, while the Cleveland District cited layoffs in transportation and financial services. The Dallas District noted further cuts in the real estate and construction industry; layoffs at major financial firms continued in the New York District; and the Philadelphia District reported that unpaid furloughs had been instituted by state and local governments. In contrast, Districts including Cleveland, Chicago, and Minneapolis reported some hiring in healthcare. Contacts in the Richmond District noted solid demand for technically-skilled professionals and IT and office-support workers. The Chicago and Dallas Districts saw a slight uptick in hiring of finance personnel due to the sharp increase in mortgage refinance activity. The St. Louis District reported that a food manufacturer and some wood and plastic manufacturers planned on expanding their operations and hiring additional staff. The employment outlook is generally bleak. Contacts in several Districts have instituted hiring freezes and anticipate further cuts in jobs and work hours.

    Continuing layoffs, furloughs and hiring freezes kept wage pressures minimal. Contacts from a broad range of industries reported pay freezes, with some noting salary reductions. The Minneapolis District reported that unionized faculty at Minnesota's technical and community colleges had tentatively accepted a two-year pay freeze. Contacts in the Boston, Philadelphia, Richmond, Chicago, and San Francisco Districts reported cuts in certain non-wage employment benefits, including cuts in bonuses, elimination or suspension of employer contributions to employee retirement programs, and increases in copayments on employer sponsored healthcare plans.



    2009

    Summary of Commentary on
    Current Economic Conditions
    by Federal Reserve District

    Commonly known as the Beige Book, this report is published eight times per year. Each Federal Reserve Bank gathers anecdotal information on current economic conditions in its District through reports from Bank and Branch directors and interviews with key business contacts, economists, market experts, and other sources. The Beige Book summarizes this information by District and sector. An overall summary of the twelve district reports is prepared by a designated Federal Reserve Bank on a rotating basis.

    2009
    January

    14

    HTML

    183 KB PDF


    February


    March

    4

    HTML

    187 KB PDF


    April

    15

    HTML

    260 KB PDF


    May


    June

    10



    July

    29



    August


    September

    9



    October

    21



    November


    December

    2



    2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996

    1970 - present (on the web site of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis)



    맞춤검색

    ,

     
    미국 소매판매, Retail Sales 지표가 월간 -1.1% 다시 감소하였고, 결국 근래 2개월간 소폭 개선되는 듯 했으나,
    침체 흐름의 일시적 기술적 둔화에 불과하고, 다시 침체가 지속되는 흐름을 보여주고 있습니다.
    장기 침체가 연장되는 흐름으로 경계와 충분한 시간 경과가 필요하다고 생각됩니다.  




    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    TUESDAY, APRIL 14, AT 8:30 A.M. EDT


    Timothy Winters / Aneta Erdie                                                                                                                                                                                            CB09-51
    Service Sector Statistics Division
    (301) 763-2713

    ADVANCE MONTHLY SALES FOR RETAIL TRADE AND FOOD SERVICES


    MARCH 2009

    Intention to Revise Retail Estimates: Monthly retail sales estimates will be revised based on the results of the 2007 Annual Retail Trade Survey. Revised not adjusted and corresponding adjusted data are scheduled for release on April 30, 2009. 

    The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for March, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $344.4 billion, a decrease of 1.1 percent (±0.5%) from the previous month and 9.4 percent (±0.7%) below March 2008. Total sales for the January through March 2009 period were down 8.8 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago. The January 2009 to February 2009 percent change was revised from -0.1 percent (±0.5%)* to +0.3 percent (±0.3%)*.

    Retail trade sales were down 1.1 percent (±0.7%) from February 2009 and 10.7 percent (±0.7%) below last year. Gasoline stations sales were down 34.0 percent (±1.5%) from March 2008 and motor vehicle and parts dealers sales were down 23.5 percent (±2.3%) from last year.

    The advance estimates are based on a subsample of the Census Bureau's full retail and food services sample. A stratified random sampling method is used to select approximately 5,000 retail and food services firms whose sales are then weighted and benchmarked to represent the complete universe of over three million retail and food services firms. Responding firms account for approximately 65% of the MARTS dollar volume estimate. For an explanation of the measures of sampling variability included in this report, please see the Reliability of Estimates section on the last page of this publication.

    Percent Change in Retail and Food Services Sales

    (Estimates adjusted for seasonal variation, holiday, and trading-day differences, but not for price changes)

    
    

    The Advance Monthly Retail Sales for Retail and Food Services for April is scheduled to be released May 13, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. EDT.

    For information, visit the Census Bureau's Web site at <http://www.census.gov/retail>. This report is also available the day of issue through the Department of Commerce's STAT-USA (202-482-1986).

    * The 90 percent confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different than zero.


    TABLE 1A. ESTIMATED MONTHLY SALES FOR RETAIL AND FOOD SERVICES, BY KIND OF BUSINESS--March 2009

    Estimates adjusted for seasonal variations and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes. (Total sales estimates are shown in millions of dollars and are based on data from the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey, Monthly Retail Trade Survey, and administrative records.)(2) (In Millions of dollars) 2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 NAICS(1) Kind of Business Mar(3) Feb Jan Mar Feb Code (a) (p) (r) (r) (r) Retail & food services, total.................... 344,380 348,359 347,311 380,171 378,191 Total (excl. motor vehicle & parts)............ 288,203 290,844 288,038 306,746 304,410 Retail ....................................... 305,830 309,246 308,613 342,444 340,684 GAFO(4).......................................... (*) 96,663 95,550 98,272 97,271 441 Motor vehicle & parts dealers.................... 56,177 57,515 59,273 73,425 73,781 4411,4412 Auto & other motor veh. dealers................. 49,659 50,926 52,720 67,011 67,405 442 Furniture & home furnishings stores.............. 8,231 8,370 8,326 9,467 9,445 443 Electronics & appliance stores.................... 8,535 9,066 9,007 9,427 9,199 44311,13 Appl., T.V. & camera........................... (*) 7,279 7,254 7,609 7,375 44312 Computer & software stores...................... (*) 1,787 1,753 1,818 1,824 444 Building material & garden eq. & supplies dealers 24,488 24,645 24,762 26,971 27,538 4441 Building mat. & supplies dealers................ (*) 20,585 20,590 22,998 23,608 445 Food & beverage stores........................... 49,469 49,239 49,308 48,671 48,367 4451 Grocery stores.................................. 44,123 43,931 44,063 43,649 43,400 4453 Beer, wine & liquor stores...................... (*) 3,578 3,591 3,452 3,421 446 Health & personal care stores.................... 21,124 21,037 20,910 20,233 20,260 44611 Pharmacies & drug stores........................ (*) 17,320 17,198 16,765 16,762 447 Gasoline stations................................ 27,896 28,339 27,474 42,253 41,523 448 Clothing & clothing accessories stores........... 17,939 18,266 17,775 18,901 18,655 44811 Men's clothing stores........................... (*) (S) (S) (S) (S) 44812 Women's clothing stores......................... (*) 3,044 2,982 3,349 3,359 4482 Shoe stores..................................... (*) 2,215 2,087 2,201 2,221 451 Sporting goods, hobby, book & music stores....... 7,287 7,355 7,350 7,396 7,311 452 General merchandise stores....................... 50,146 50,229 49,643 49,509 49,204 4521 Department stores (ex. L.D.).................... 16,057 16,106 15,965 16,990 17,103 4521 Department stores (incl. L.D.)(5)............... (*) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) 4529 Other general merchandise stores................ (*) 34,123 33,678 32,519 32,101 45291 Warehouse clubs & supercenters................. (*) 30,253 29,954 28,875 28,385 45299 All other gen. merchandise stores.............. (*) 3,870 3,724 3,644 3,716 453 Miscellaneous store retailers.................... 9,519 9,736 9,214 9,867 9,715 454 Nonstore retailers............................... 25,019 25,449 25,571 26,324 25,686 4541 Electronic shopping & mail-order houses......... (*) 18,264 18,301 17,912 17,504 722 Food services & drinking places.................. 38,550 39,113 38,698 37,727 37,507 (*) Advance estimates are not available for this kind of business. (NA) Not available (S) Suppressed (a) Advance estimate (p) Preliminary estimate (r) Revised estimate (1) For a full description of the NAICS codes used in this table, see http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html (2) Estimates are concurrently adjusted for seasonal variation and for holiday and trading day differences, but not for price changes. Concurrent seasonal adjustment uses all available unadjusted estimates as input to the X-12 ARIMA program. The factors derived from the program are used in calculating all seasonally adjusted estimates shown in this table. Year-to-date seasonally adjusted sales estimates are not tabulated. Adjustment factors and explanatory material can be found on the Internet at http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/mrts.html (3) Advance estimates are based on early reports obtained from a small sample of firms selected from the larger Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS) sample. All other estimates are from the MRTS sample. (4) GAFO represents firms which specialize in department store types of merchandise and is comprised of furniture & home furnishings (442), electronics & appliances (443), clothing & clothing accessories (448), sporting goods, hobby, book, and music (451), general merchandise (452), office supply, stationery, and gift stores (4532). (5) Estimates include data for leased departments operated within department stores. Data for this line are not included in broader kind-of-business totals.

    TABLE 1B. ESTIMATED MONTHLY SALES FOR RETAIL AND FOOD SERVICES, BY KIND OF BUSINESS--March 2009

    Estimates not adjusted for seasonal variations and holiday and trading-day differences and price changes. (In Millions of dollars and Annual Percent Change) 3 month total % Chg. 2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 NAICS(1) Kind of Business 2009 from Mar(2) Feb Jan Mar Feb Code 2008 (a) (p) (r) Retail & food services, total.................... 966,116 -10.1 338,716 308,599 318,801 378,755 348,876 Total (excl. motor vehicle & parts)............ 800,901 -6.8 278,617 255,952 266,332 300,572 278,636 Retail ....................................... 854,825 -11.5 299,742 273,006 282,077 340,236 313,244 GAFO(3).......................................... (*) (*) (*) 83,579 84,003 93,727 87,385 441 Motor vehicle & parts dealers.................... 165,215 -23.2 60,099 52,647 52,469 78,183 70,240 4411,4412 Auto & other motor veh. dealers................. 146,785 -25.5 53,483 46,750 46,552 71,769 64,304 44111 New car dealers................................ (*) (*) (*) 35,603 36,334 56,849 51,188 4413 Auto parts, acc. & tire stores.................. (*) (*) (*) 5,897 5,917 6,414 5,936 442 Furniture & home furnishings stores.............. 23,094 -13.9 7,951 7,466 7,677 9,136 8,822 4421 Furniture stores................................ (*) (*) (*) 4,434 4,370 5,100 5,063 4422 Home furnishings stores......................... (*) (*) (*) 3,032 3,307 4,036 3,759 443 Electronics & appliance stores.................... 24,895 -5.5 7,796 8,492 8,607 8,659 8,857 44311,13 Appl., T.V. & camera........................... (*) (*) (*) 6,857 6,964 6,886 7,146 44312 Computer & software stores...................... (*) (*) (*) 1,635 1,643 1,773 1,711 444 Building material & garden eq. & supplies dealers 61,313 -11.6 23,741 18,528 19,044 25,703 21,783 4441 Building mat. & supplies dealers................ (*) (*) (*) 16,015 16,616 21,802 19,264 445 Food & beverage stores........................... 140,814 -0.1 47,673 44,392 48,749 48,557 45,351 4451 Grocery stores.................................. 127,060 -0.5 42,888 39,933 44,239 43,824 40,970 4453 Beer, wine & liquor stores...................... (*) (*) (*) 2,959 3,106 3,176 2,976 446 Health & personal care stores.................... 62,399 2.2 21,504 19,985 20,910 20,779 20,078 44611 Pharmacies & drug stores........................ (*) (*) (*) 16,558 17,370 17,184 16,712 447 Gasoline stations................................ 76,454 -34.1 27,115 24,145 25,194 41,281 36,789 448 Clothing & clothing accessories stores........... 45,569 -6.4 16,541 15,171 13,857 18,119 16,128 44811 Men's clothing stores........................... (*) (*) (*) 623 652 816 722 44812 Women's clothing stores......................... (*) (*) (*) 2,417 2,299 3,406 2,785 44814 Family clothing stores.......................... (*) (*) (*) 5,713 5,461 6,751 5,680 4482 Shoe stores..................................... (*) (*) (*) 1,918 1,663 2,285 1,999 451 Sporting goods, hobby, book & music stores....... 19,367 -1.8 6,449 5,752 7,166 6,649 6,024 452 General merchandise stores....................... 133,847 -0.3 46,841 43,611 43,395 47,929 44,205 4521 Department stores (ex. L.D.).................... 40,277 -8.1 14,407 13,169 12,701 15,938 14,490 4521 Department stores (incl. L.D.)(4)............... (*) (*) (*) 13,523 13,038 16,384 14,891 4529 Other general merchandise stores................ (*) (*) (*) 30,442 30,694 31,991 29,715 45291 Warehouse clubs & supercenters................. (*) (*) (*) 27,137 27,618 28,442 26,426 45299 All other gen. merchandise stores.............. (*) (*) (*) 3,305 3,076 3,549 3,289 453 Miscellaneous store retailers.................... 26,010 -5.4 8,972 8,620 8,418 9,224 9,025 454 Nonstore retailers............................... 75,848 -4.7 25,060 24,197 26,591 26,017 25,942 4541 Electronic shopping & mail-order houses......... (*) (*) (*) 16,346 17,843 16,855 16,401 722 Food services & drinking places.................. 111,291 2.0 38,974 35,593 36,724 38,519 35,632 (*) Advance estimates are not available for this kind of business. (NA) Not available (a) Advance estimate (p) Preliminary estimate (r) Revised estimate (1) For a full description of the NAICS codes used in this table, see http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html (2) Advance estimates are based on early reports obtained from a small sample of firms selected from the larger Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS) sample. All other estimates are from the MRTS sample. (3) GAFO represents firms which specialize in department store types of merchandise and is comprised of furniture & home furnishings (442), electronics & appliances (443), clothing & clothing accessories (448), sporting goods, hobby, book, and music (451), general merchandise (452), office supply, stationery, and gift stores (4532). (4) Estimates include data for leased departments operated within department stores. Data for this line are not included in broader kind-of-business totals.

    TABLE 2A. ESTIMATED CHANGE IN SALES FOR RETAIL AND FOOD SERVICES, BY KIND OF BUSINESS--March 2009

    Estimates adjusted for seasonal variations and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes (Estimates are shown as percents and are based on data from the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey, Monthly Retail Trade Survey, and administrative records.)(*) Mar Feb 2009 2009 adv. prel. from-- from-- NAICS Kind of Business Feb Mar Jan Feb Code 2009 2008 2009 2008 (p) (r) (r) (r) Retail & food Services, total.................... -1.1 -9.4 +0.3 -7.9 Total (excl. motor vehicle & parts ).......... -0.9 -6.0 +1.0 -4.5 Retail .................................. -1.1 -10.7 +0.2 -9.2 441 Motor vehicle & parts dealers.................... -2.3 -23.5 -3.0 -22.0 4411,4412 Auto & other motor veh. dealers............... -2.5 -25.9 -3.4 -24.4 442 Furniture & home furnishings stores.............. -1.7 -13.1 +0.5 -11.4 443 Electronics & appliance stores................... -5.9 -9.5 +0.7 -1.4 444 Building material & garden eq. & supplies dealers -0.6 -9.2 -0.5 -10.5 445 Food & beverage stores........................... +0.5 +1.6 -0.1 +1.8 4451 Grocery stores.................................. +0.4 +1.1 -0.3 +1.2 446 Health & personal care stores.................... +0.4 +4.4 +0.6 +3.8 447 Gasoline stations................................ -1.6 -34.0 +3.1 -31.8 448 Clothing & clothing accessories stores........... -1.8 -5.1 +2.8 -2.1 451 Sporting goods, hobby, book & music stores........ -0.9 -1.5 +0.1 +0.6 452 General merchandise stores....................... -0.2 +1.3 +1.2 +2.1 4521 Department stores (ex. L.D.).................... -0.3 -5.5 +0.9 -5.8 453 Miscellaneous stores retailers................... -2.2 -3.5 +5.7 +0.2 454 Nonstore retailers............................... -1.7 -5.0 -0.5 -0.9 722 Food services & drinking places.................. -1.4 +2.2 +1.1 +4.3 (p) Preliminary estimate (r) Revised estimate (*) Estimates shown in this table are derived from adjusted estimates provided in Table 1A of this report.

    TABLE 2B. ESTIMATED CHANGE IN SALES FOR RETAIL AND FOOD SERVICES, BY KIND OF BUSINESS--March 2009

    Data not adjusted for seasonal variations and holiday and trading-day differences and price changes. (Estimates are shown as percents and are based on data from the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey, Monthly Retail Trade Survey, and administrative records.)(*) Mar Feb 2009 2009 adv. prel. from-- from-- NAICS Kind of Business Feb Mar Jan Feb Code 2009 2008 2009 2008 (p) (r) (r) (r) Retail & food Services, total.................... +9.8 -10.6 -3.2 -11.5 Total (excl. motor vehicle & parts ).......... +8.9 -7.3 -3.9 -8.1 Retail .................................. +9.8 -11.9 -3.2 -12.8 441 Motor vehicle & parts dealers.................... +14.2 -23.1 +0.3 -25.0 4411,4412 Auto & other motor veh. dealers................ +14.4 -25.5 +0.4 -27.3 442 Furniture & home furnishings stores.............. +6.5 -13.0 -2.7 -15.4 443 Electronics & appliance stores................... -8.2 -10.0 -1.3 -4.1 444 Building material & garden eq. & supplies dealers +28.1 -7.6 -2.7 -14.9 445 Food & beverage stores........................... +7.4 -1.8 -8.9 -2.1 4451 Grocery stores.................................. +7.4 -2.1 -9.7 -2.5 446 Health & personal care stores.................... +7.6 +3.5 -4.4 -0.5 447 Gasoline stations................................ +12.3 -34.3 -4.2 -34.4 448 Clothing & clothing accessories stores........... +9.0 -8.7 +9.5 -5.9 451 Sporting goods, hobby, book & music stores........ +12.1 -3.0 -19.7 -4.5 452 General merchandise stores....................... +7.4 -2.3 +0.5 -1.3 4521 Department stores (ex. L.D.).................... +9.4 -9.6 +3.7 -9.1 453 Miscellaneous stores retailers................... +4.1 -2.7 +2.4 -4.5 454 Nonstore retailers............................... +3.6 -3.7 -9.0 -6.7 722 Food services & drinking places.................. +9.5 +1.2 -3.1 -0.1 (p) Preliminary estimate (r) Revised estimate (*) Estimates shown in this table are derived from not adjusted estimates provided in Table 1B of this report.
    SOURCE: Advance Monthly Sales for Retail Trade and Food Services--MARCH 2009 (Press Release available without charge from Public Information Office, Bureau of the Census Washington, D.C. 20233). Survey methodology and measures of sampling variability are documented in the Advance Press Release. Questions concerning this report should be directed to Mr. Timothy Winters (301) 763-2713.

    Survey Description

    The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the Advance Monthly Retail Trade and Food Services Survey (MARTS) to provide an early estimate of monthly sales by kind of business for retail and food service firms located in the United States. Each month, questionnaires are mailed to a probability sample of approximately 5,000 employer firms selected from the larger Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS). Firms responding to MARTS account for approximately 65% of the total national sales estimate. Advance sales estimates are computed using a link relative estimator. The change in sales from the previous month is estimated using only units that have reported data for both the current and previous month. There is no imputation or adjustment for nonrespondents in MARTS. The total sales estimate is derived by multiplying this ratio by the preliminary sales estimate for the previous month (derived from the larger MRTS sample). Detailed industry estimates are summed to derive total estimates at broad industry levels. The monthly estimates are adjusted using annual survey estimates and for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences. Additional information on MARTS and MRTS can be found on the Census Bureau website at: http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/mrts.html.

    Reliability of Estimates

    Because the estimates presented in this report are based on a sample survey, they contain sampling error and nonsampling error. Sampling error is the difference between the estimate and the result that would be obtained from a complete enumeration of the sampling frame conducted under the same survey conditions. This error occurs because only a subset of the entire sampling frame is measured in a sample survey. Standard errors and coefficients of variation (CV), as given in Table 3 of this report, are estimated measures of sampling variation. The margin of sampling error, as used on page 1, gives a range about the estimate which is 90-percent confidence interval. If, for example, the percent change estimate is +1.2 percent and its estimated standard error is 0.9 percent, then the margin of sampling error is ±1.65 x 0.9 percent or ±1.5 percent, and the 90 percent confidence interval is -0.3 percent to +2.7 percent. If the interval contains 0, then one does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude at the 90 percent confidence level that the change is different from zero and therefore the change is not statistically significant. Estimated changes shown in the text are statistically significant unless otherwise noted. For a monthly total, the median estimated coefficient of variation is given. The resulting confidence interval is the estimated value ±1.65 x CV x (the estimated monthly total). The Census Bureau recommends that individuals using estimates in this report incorporate this information into their analyses, as sampling error could affect the conclusions drawn from the estimates. Nonsampling error encompasses all other factors that contribute to the total error of a sample survey estimate. This type of error can occur because of nonresponse, insufficient coverage of the universe of retail businesses, mistakes in the recording and coding of data, and other errors of collection, response, coverage, or processing. Although nonsampling error is not measured directly, the Census Bureau employs quality control procedures throughout the process to minimize this type of error.


    (1) Estimated measures of sampling variability are based on estimates not adjusted for seasonal variation, or holiday, or trading-day differences. Medians are based on estimates for the most recent 12 months.

    (2) These columns provide measures of the difference between the advance-to-preliminary and preliminary-to-final estimates of month-to-month change for the same pair of months as measured by the Advance sample and MRTS sample. The average and median differences are based on estimates for the most recent 12 months.

    Note: Additional information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/mrts.html
    o Current Quarter Retail E-Commerce Sales

    Source: Retail Indicators Branch, U.S. Census Bureau | Last Revised: April 14, 2009


    맞춤검색

    ,

    (★ 검색으로 결과를 얻어보세요. Let's Search ★)



    --> I'm Lucky 최근글 <--